Empty elections in Tower Hamlets dated 4 May 2006
Editor in Chief
©MUHAMMAD HAQUE.
These pages are regularly updated and the contents moved from here and archived after short displays.
The 10th Edition London 2040 GMT / 2140 Hrs UK time Wednesday 3 May 2006
LEGAL NOTICEThe materials published here are originally authored items that are only published for education and information purposes only.
None of the materials is intended for any commercial, party political, unethical, immoral purposes or uses or applications disseminations or citations whatever.
None of the material must be referred to without the full legal and moral parameters being recognised and that recognition must be reasonably and accurately identical to one that is hereby and herewith stated and implied.
All legal and authoring rights belong to the rights-holders who are identified with each appropriate items
Permission must be sought before any material is used in anyway that the law and morality warrant should be done only by seeking the authors’ and the rights holder’s prior written permission.
Where no by-line is included the IPRs and other rights are asserted by the Editor in chief and by the publishing organisation the AADHIKAR Foundation.
These pages are regularly updated and the contents moved from here and archived after short displays. The Oldest files posted here will be deleted or moved off this site or pages first.
Visitors and viewers are advised to bear this fact in mind.
To access the AADHIKAR library and archives, please send your name and postal address and specify the date and subject [starting from 19 December 1980 to the present date]
CLICK HERE to send an email request or to send an email directly from your own e-mail sender to aadhikarlibrary@yahoo.co.uk
To send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail addressaadhikaronline@yahho.co.uk
Election in the East End?
Exhaustion! More like! And to what avail? What for?
Time to put back some decent political clothes back on Janet Ludlow’s politically exposed embarssnet over her theft of the Khoodeelaar! campaign association
A Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 commentary
By ©Muhammad Haque
2040 Hrs GMT / 2140 hrs Uktime London Wednesday 3 May 2006
For the past 10 days or so, the whole of the Brick Lane London E1 area has begun to be targeted by noise-makers. Most of them are on foot. Like George Galloway, who was looking lost for direction as he stood in the corner of Greatorex Street and Hanbury Street two days ago. As he looked puzzled, my Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole colleague could not help wondering out loud as to whether Galloway’s companions too had suddenly landed in the area from another planet.!
I shall publish my Open letter to free George Galloway, on Thursday 4 May 2006.
Back to the noise that the canvassers and touts are making in the area.
All the noise, all the lying! All the running around!
In that order!
No big message
No clear water
No line of difference
No distinction
No measuring of vice against virtue
No morality
No fibre
No flavour
No fire of passion against any real or imaginable enemy of the people.
It is all so dull. So boring,. So very boring.
How can this be democracy!
It is like deadly dead beat!
To paraphrase and apply the key point of the imagery used by one time British Labour leadership contender Denis Healey who mocked his Conservative Party contemporary Geoffrey Howe, being hit by the electioneering words or the campaign in Tower Hamlets around the 4 May 2006 council elections is like being savaged by a political feather duster!
There is no impact. !
There is no substance!
there is no message. !
There is substance vacuum. !
Even the chromosomally young ‘candidates’ are prone to behave like they are septuagenarians!
The heavy air of authority verges ever so slightly on the margins of authoritarianism. !
The glare in their eyes says more of the threat of neo-fascistic contempt for the people. Although their glare might have been acquired from over indulgence in over hasty attempts at recovering from exhaustion by drinking too much!
Or by doing something similar to drink abuse
And for what?
It doesn’t make sense
Not if we look at the very irresposnble behaviour of Janet Ludlow and her pet closet parade of candidates
How did they think they would ever get away with the stunt so outrageous that no sensible person would have done what they have done
Did they think that making a fake DVD containing falsified references to the Khoodeelaar! campaign trigger word would go unnoticed?
Did they think that placing a brazenly conceived stolen image photo of the Khoodeelaar demonstration in a half page advertisement in the East London Idiotiser would remain off the record?
Concealed?
Hidden?
Did they think that this would not bring back memories of Lib Dems Dirty tricks?
Did they think that by including a Khoodeelaar! demonstration picture with the
.
For one thing, it is a stunt that would not fit Janet's party political, career history.
And the facts that we have made formal complaints to the Police against her and her co-colluders, shows that Janet will be having to spend much longer answering our questions and the law’s questions than she would otherwise have to have
Had she behaved honestly
had she behaved decently
Had she behaved with dignity
And this is a serious problem with ‘politicos’
they simply do not come across as having any of those qualities
And sooner or later, they come unstuck and their pretensions slip away
As Janet’s party political pants came off this past week with her shameless launching of a propaganda literature based on her and her Group’s and her party's theft of the Khoodeelaar! campaign event and information and by her criminal falsification of the image that was distorted to bend over in favour of the stooges that she favoured as those same stooges are in awe of the leader of the corrupt clique on Tower Hamkest Council because of the stooges receipt of funds from the Council.
As Janet Ludlow’s political careerist pants came off, they exposed a very petty political interior that has lurked underneath that over-made up exterior of political opportunism! And other utterly greedy facades she has feigned to cultivate over the past 12 years of ignominious performance and rank idiocy and incompetence as an alleged leader of opposition to one of Britain's moist corrupt clique on an inner city Council.
[To be continued]
From the previous [the 9th] edition Wednesday 3 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail-hole-inviting-lies of Janet Ludlow and her closet candidates also promoted by her as ‘Lib Dems’ candidates
LATEST allegations against Ludlow’s pro-CrossRail-hole roles, as confirmed to the Metropolitan police on Wednesday 3 May 2006
The Khoodeelaar! campaign against CrossRail hoe Council has confirmed in statement issued to the Metropolitan Police today Wednesday 3 May 2006 that there are over 20 different items and categories of evidence available which are being made available to the Metropolitan Police against Janet Ludlow’s behaviour and the behaviour of the Lib Deems Group over the Khoodeelaar campaign against Crassrail hole
From the previous, the 8th edition 3 May 2006 :
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail-hole-Tower Hamlets Council! MANIFESTO 2006 COMMWENATRY
By ©Muhammad Haque
1520 Hrs GMT Wednesday 3 May 2006
Elections! What elections?
In the ‘most deprived borough’ of Tower Hamlets, East London, the Council will NOT become a better Council after 4 May 2006 elections.
In fact if the Janet Ludlow and her Lib Dems closet candidates get anywhere near the scope to form any alliance with the Tories or with the corrupt clique of Michael Keith, Tower Hamlets Council will definitely be a lot worse than it has been thus far.
that is a very worrying prospect
The only way that the community in the East End will be defended from the violations of a corrupt sleazy Council is by the people organising to defend of the community.
On all issues that matter
From the formal abuses of the meetings of the Council to the actual, day-to-day behaviour of councillors
Yes, councillors!
Do not be misled by their plastic smiles and bogus sociability today
Remember, they are in it for themselves
If they weren’t, they would not have done what they have done against the community over the past four years
They have lied
They have pretended
They have denied
They have deprived
They have conspired
They have colluded
They have deceived us
They have dismissed the community at every turn
There is no commitment in any of their manifestos, any of their leaflets, any of their brochures to uphold any of the peoples’ rights that have been violated over the past 4 years
There is no evidence whatever of any acknowledgement of the CrossRail hole threat, far less of the pivotal democratising role played by Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole colluding Council and against the CrossRail hole plotting Tony Blair administration at the UK central Government
They have proved that they are out of control, out of bounds from the demands of ethics and morality, of the defined descriptions of democracy.
They are out of sync with morality.
With ethics
With the basic rules the expectations of decent human society and its requirements
They are out for just their owns elves, their petty pathetic careers
They say one thing and they do another
They lie to their colleagues, tell lies about other colleagues and then they pretend that they have done nothing wrong
They place their
They have promised the earth, they have plundered our words
they have suppressed the demands
That is what Janet Ludlow and her lot of closet councillor candidates have done
And that is about the level of behaviour we can expect from all of the rest of them
[To be continued]
From the previous edition :
How KHOODEELAAR! the Brick Lane London E1 area campaign against the CrossRail-hole Tower Hamlets Council shaped the political agenda in December 2005 for the 4 May 2006 elections in Tower HamletsThe power of the truth against the crooks in control of Tower Hamlets Council and their bribed peddlers of Crossrail hole lies
By Muhammad Haque
To VIEW That EAST LONDON IDIOTISER [Thursday 5 January 2006]report about KHOODEELAAR! 2006 Manifesto, CLICK HERE
When I wrote the first substantive parts of the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 in December 2005, I did so in the logical expectation that that manifesto would press home to the crooks in control of Tower Hamlets Council the truth of the campaign determination that we should not let the CrossRail hole pass here.
I had long ago decided to treat the local East London Idiotiser as a parasite publication for me to have any real confidence in it as a journal of record.
That was based on my knowledge of the exceedingly sleazy and immoral behaviour that went on inside the ‘editorial suite’ in what was by then a very shoddy and very obscure ‘only local paper for the borough of Tower Hamlets’ area.
But I received an unexpected message, addressed to the khoodeelaar! legal e-mail address late in December 2005 from a new name on that ‘paper’ seeking to make contacts with the Khoodeelaar campaign.
Why unexpected?
Because I had abandoned the idea that that title had any reporters or ordinarily awake journalists left on it at all
Apparently they had come across the news of the Khoodeelaar! campaign on the internet.
As I knew, they were half awake!
Khoodeelaar! had been publishing all the campaign documents, all the original analyses of the crassly conceived CrossRail hole plan and that of the Crossrail hole Bill [formally presented in the UK House of Commons on 22 February 2005 by Alistair Darling] campaign correspondence and updates on several web sites solidly non-stop since AT LEAST July 2004.
To detail the behaviour of the East London Idiotiser over the previous years that the campaign against Crassrail hole attack had been going on would be revealing of how corrupt all the recognised and the 'respectable' organs of local democracy in the East End of London are and have been.
I shall do that analysis and examination at a later date. Or dates
Back to the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 and what chronologically happened as far a the EAST London Advertiser has been concerned.
In December 2005, I gave them the necessary documentary back up, explained the context and history of the Khoodeelaar! campaign and summarised all the key demands that we had put to the Government and to the local Tower Hamlets Council and emphasised that they [the East London ‘Advertiser’] must remember that I would not overlook any factual errors on their parts far less any lying in the East London Idiotiser for the Crossrail-hole Tower Hamlets Council.
Eventually, they ran a story on the Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Campaign
That was not the first time that our campaign had featured in the East London Idiotiser.
But their previous front page splash on 21 October 2004, had been left inconclusive when I took emergency steps to help change the regime on the paper [Which change did take place – hence the ‘new’ set of ‘staff. More on that phenomenal intervention by KHOODEELAAR! at another time’].
Again, the story of the actual role and the 'journalistic' role as played by or via the East London Idiotiser is a fascinating one about quality of ‘democratic institutions’ in the context of the community’s holding the ‘elected and pubic holders of office to due and manifest accountability.
The Khoodeelaar! No to the Crossrail hole Tower Hamlets Council campaign and the prevaricating role of the East London Idiotiser neatly illustrate the problems that we have here in London’s ‘inner city’ East End before we can say reasonably confidently that we can trust the ‘local institutions' of 'democracy'; and 'legitimate representation' to protect the people and to speak up for the people.
For now, back to the East London Idiotiser’s first report on the Khoodeelaar! manifesto 2006 and the impact that our Manifesto movement has had and will; continue to have beyond tomorrow’s [Thursday 4 May 2006] formal voting.
the On 5 January 2006, the East London Idiotiser carried a piece that was trailed in the streets with a very unavoidable placard.
It shouted out from the placards pasted on walls in the Whitechapel Road that Crossrail was THE issue that would have a decisive impact on the Council elections [that were exactly 4 months off on the day - the trailers were put up late on 4 January 2006].
In the peiec that the paper ran on page 4 [East London Advertiser, Thursday 5 January 2006], the message was unmistakable for the Blairing clique.
The main two-line, 5-word headline solidly said, "CROSSRAIL SCHEME ‘WILL COST LABOUR’ ”.
To any reasonably objective reader of the 4-column piece, it would be very clear indeed that the whole item was based on the Idiotiser’s encountering of undeniable evidence that KHOODEELAAR! was THE campaign against the CrossRail hole.
Although the Iodiser’s newly-announced reporter concerned had not stated it as such in his e-mail contacts seeking information from Khoodeelaar, they had been prompted by the fact that our publications on various web sites of the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto had been widely noticed and accessed.
To view that 5 January 2006 EAST LONDON ADVERTISER piece about the KHOODELAAR! 2006 MANIFESTO, click here. Remember that at no time between 17 January 2006 and 27 April 2006 has the same EAST LONDON ADVERTYISER or its relevant reporter Ted Jeory acknowledged in any of their NEWS pieces the fact that they had in fact themselves admitted in that peiec that it was Khoodeelaar! that was the grassroots campaign against the CrossRail hole assault.
Why they started to apply that untenable amnesia is the subject of the next part of my analysis.
[To be continued]
From the previous, the 3rd edition, published at 1120 Hrs GMT Wednesday 3 May 2006
Why the Khoodeelaar! legal action [which is in process now] against Crossrail hole Bill Minister Alistair Darling is the best way to get him to confess that he lied and that he should not have lied to and in the UK Parliament
By Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area campaign the Crossrail hole Bill, plan, project]
I told Alistair Darling’s CrossRail office on Tuesday [2 May 2006 - at 1600 Hrs GMT] that their latest ‘explanation’ about the existence of parliamentary accountability by the Secretary of State was not at all acceptable.
I said that the routine ritualistic recitations of a list of ‘units’ or states that their communication of yesterday contained, was not at all what I had been after when I demanded that Alistair Darling show what accountability he delivered to Parliament before he decided to make the grant of One hundred million ponds sterling to the CrossRail London railway Ltd [the Crossrail outfit].
[The Full texts of the latest legal demands put to Alistair Darling being put today 3 May 2006 will be reported here later on today]
During December 2005, the UK’s Crossrail hole Bill promoting Minister Alistair Darling gave away one hundred million pounds of the public money to a shadowy, unaccountable outfit plugging for Crassrail assault on the East End.
Darling made that grant available in semi-secret sub-parliamentary in fact almost unparliamentarily and in a sneaky way.
As he has done in his ‘written statement’ of 30 March 2006 following the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail DIRTY hole plan against the East End generally and against the Brick Lane London E1 area in particular.
I first found out about that when I did a check on what he was upto in late December.
And I could not beehive my eyes when I saw that he had made a grant of One hundred million for no reason at all.
I knew that the grant cash would be used to undertake activities that were not explained to parliament.
And when I looked deeper I noticed that the abuse parliament had been done by the application of an unaccountable Section that had been sneaked into a scarcely-debated legislation which was now in 'the statutes Book' as the Railways Act 2005.
It was an Act that had been brought in without any real debate let alone any even awareness of its implications by the so-called Opposition parties or by their MPs
Whenever had Parliament been in a state of uproar about that Act when it must have been at committee stages?
The answer is NEVER>
And the fact that there was no uproar shows that 'democracy' and accountability are mere words of decoration as far as the UK House of Commons goes.
Those words are not meant to be obtained by the official Opposition MPs.
Let alone by the less than official Opposition Lib Dems in the House of Commons
The only elected chamber of the allegedly two-chamber UK parliament.- the frighteningly-promoted 'Mother of Parliaments'!
What a spectacle of inanity the collection of pro-Crossrail MPs made when they took part in the so-called debate held on 19 July 2005.
From the previous edition: 3 May 2006
Tower Hamlets Council ‘poll outcome’ unfathomable, says the Guardian’s pathetically unreliable Patrick Wintour. Why can’t he fathom it? Or for that matter, why can’t the Guardian fathom any morass of immorality that the Blairing corruption of society has produced? Why isn’t the Guardian ever able to fathom any of the degeneration caused by their chums holding office? Why isn’t the Guardian ever able to tell the truth about anything of importance to people in society? How bad is the Guardian as a ‘newspaper’ or news organisation? Why does it keep sucking up to the sleaziest elements in society while pretending to be doing the opposite? Why isn’t there a truthful ‘newspaper’ in Britain?- Crossrail hole Minister Alistair Darling’s Department replies to KHOODEELAAR! legal questions
– update 3 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! evidence against Crossrail-hole-Council Chief Executive Christine Gilbert – an update and analysis 3 May 2006
How to avoid having Janet Ludlow and her pet Liberal Democrats reviving a nightmare regime on Tower Hamlets Council Muhammad Haque political commentary on ‘Why George Galloway must be freed from party bureaucracy to do what he does best – campaign for the causes that he truly believes in’ Where in the LSE [London School of Economics] is their own Jeffrey Archer? And why has the BBC been promoting the LSE’s Jeffrey Archer so fervently? – to be disclosed and discussed in another world exclusive MUHAMMAD HAQUE Political Commentary here, shortly
Why has the ‘sub-local’ ‘newspaper’ ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ done yet another ignorant FrontPage splash? Like its premature and corruptly edited [!} ‘CELEBRATION' headline in the issue published in the last week of March 2006 plugging the lies of Tower Hamlets Council corrupt clique leader Michael Keith and his collection of ethnicity-linked exhibits, the idiotically-edited[!] organ has in its edition published today [3 May 2006] exceeded its own record of stupidity about the area.- An AADHIKARonline dissection of the ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ here shortly
.
From the previous edition: 2200 Hrs GMT Tuesday 2 May 2006
AADHIKARonline London Tuesday 2 May 2006
Exclusive online reporting on the inner state of the inner cities in the Britain fronted by Tony Blair
Why has George Galloway’s RESPECT party published a pledge to work with any party after 4 May 2006?
Why that pledge is proof positive that there will NOT be a better Council after 4 May 2006 in Tower Hamlets
The only way that that can happen is if people stop having any confidence in the corrupt the unethical the lying the self-serving candidates who are now desperately, insanely trying to get our votes.
They are not talking about any principles whatever
The only people talking about principles are the people on the ground.
The people who are not party to any of the cliques that are prodding and prompting and promoting the current crop of candidates, whether or not they are ‘new’ candidates or whether they are old ones.
[To be continued]
From the previous edition: 1900 Hrs GMT Tuesday 2 May 2006
Why I shall not be voting on 4 May 2006
By Muhammad Haque
I am writing this from a location in the Brick Lane London East One area. It is Tower Hamlets borough. One of the most corruptly operated borough councils in the whole country. Even George Galloway has called it the most reprehensible council. And that is assaying something. Given the way Galloway himself has been described in the commentaries in the West.
As I write this at 1855 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 2 May 2006, most of the candidates in the borough are flying on the skies and on levels that are beyond the reaches of ordinary people. Those candidates are not well. They are either sick of losing their seats. Or sick of being exposed as being useless if they fail to get in. Whatever it is that moves them, the election fever is bad for the health. It is worse for the voters. As the outcome will not make Tower Hamlets a better council. Not by the records that I can check.
My voting will hardly change anything. It never could. So I have not been voting for ages. The last time that I attended a polling station, in Tower Hamlets, a lying Lib Dem candidate promised to look into the racist behaviour of one of Tower Hamlets Council’s lying racist staff. He never did. That racist staff had behaved offensively.. It deterred me
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Tower Hamlets Council on the day after the election results are definitively announced
Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail hole-colluding Council has called a demonstration on the first day after the Council elections results are definitely announced, to register the demand for en end to all CrossRail hole collusion and lying by the newly constituted Council.
More details will be published by Khoodeelaar in the next three days
One of the speakers invited to address the Khoodeelaar! Demonstration is local MP George Galloway
Interesting previews on the elections results will also appear about Galloway’s’ RESPECT party and its business-manager-cum-publicist Ron McKay here shortly
from the previous edition published at 1500 Hrs GMT 2 may 2006-05-02
Breaking NEWS latest Khoodeelaar! NO to Crossrail hole campaign complaints to the Electoral Commission against the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems election leaflet and propaganda lies
- Khoodeelaar files complaints against Lib Dems and Janet Ludlow with Electoral commission
- Khoodeelaar reports Janet Ludlow and her agents to the Metropolitan Police
- Khoodeelaar! Demands withdrawal of Lib Dems ‘news’ and falsehood-filled Advertisement
[Fuller reports here during Tuesday 2 May 2006]
How Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dems Group leader Janet Ludlow lied for Crossrail hole-inviting clique and their ethnicity-linked surrogates in the Brick Lane LondonE1 Area
an AADHIKARonline report Tuesday 2 May 2006
Who is the local council ‘politician’ whose main term of ‘political analysis’ has been Bollocks on more than one occasion! Who else but Janet Ludlow, the so-called leader of the Opposition for twelve years on the Tower Hamlets Council.
’Janet Ludlow’s obsession with ‘Bollocks’ is symptomatic of her lack of integrity! Not to say, lack of elegance in political discourse! Which is why she has been caught with her political pants down stealing the image of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CrossRail hole, pilfering the impact of the Khoodeelaar campaign, burgling the message of the Khoodeelaar! No to all crooks and corruption and trying to hide it under her slippery politically opportunistic pants!
Janet Ludlow has misled the community for the past 12 years. She has done this by posing as the Lib Dems group leader, the ‘leader’ of the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Council.
In the 12 years of her misleadership of the opposition, she has failed to oppose. She has refused to Oppose. She has utterly abysmally neglected to oppose.
Her failure, her negligence and her refusal are serious failings.
Failing the whole community in Tower Hamlets.
As many people in Tower Hamlets have suffered bad service, no service, poor service, and disservice because of Janet Ludlow’s lousy loads of Bollocks-obsessed political pretensions.
The worst of those exhibitions came in October 2004 when the Khoodeelaar campaign against CrossRail hole monitored the behaviour of the
From the previous edition Tuesday 2 May 2006
In the aadhikaronline during Tuesday 2 May 2006
- How Tower Hamlets [East London] Council Lib Dems ‘leader’ Janet Ludlow falsified crucial evidence of the Khoodeelaar campaign against CrossRail – how she collude with conspirators to pervert the course of the campaign against Crossrail hole plan- how the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems 'leader' Janet Ludlow defamed key campaign leaders of Khoodeelaar and how the liar Janet then shamelessly participated in the disgraceful decision to use the photo of the very same Khoodeelaar campaigner in a desperate Lib Dumb bid to ingratiate themselves to the community that recognises the Khoodeelaar! Campaign so clearly – Why Janet Ludlow and she personally, prejudicially, pathetically chosen closet pack of Tower Hamlets Lib Dems MUST NOT BE TRUSTED on 4 May 2006
None of the materials is intended for any commercial, party political, unethical, immoral purposes or uses or applications disseminations or citations whatever.
None of the material must be referred to without the full legal and moral parameters being recognised and that recognition must be reasonably and accurately identical to one that is hereby and herewith stated and implied.
All legal and authoring rights belong to the rights-holders who are identified with each appropriate items
Permission must be sought before any material is used in anyway that the law and morality warrant should be done only by seeking the authors’ and the rights holder’s prior written permission.
Where no by-line is included the IPRs and other rights are asserted by the Editor in chief and by the publishing organisation the AADHIKAR Foundation.
These pages are regularly updated and the contents moved from here and archived after short displays. The Oldest files posted here will be deleted or moved off this site or pages first.
Visitors and viewers are advised to bear this fact in mind.
To access the AADHIKAR library and archives, please send your name and postal address and specify the date and subject [starting from 19 December 1980 to the present date]
CLICK HERE to send an email request or to send an email directly from your own e-mail sender to aadhikarlibrary@yahoo.co.uk
To send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail addressaadhikaronline@yahho.co.uk
Election in the East End?
Exhaustion! More like! And to what avail? What for?
Time to put back some decent political clothes back on Janet Ludlow’s politically exposed embarssnet over her theft of the Khoodeelaar! campaign association
A Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 commentary
By ©Muhammad Haque
2040 Hrs GMT / 2140 hrs Uktime London Wednesday 3 May 2006
For the past 10 days or so, the whole of the Brick Lane London E1 area has begun to be targeted by noise-makers. Most of them are on foot. Like George Galloway, who was looking lost for direction as he stood in the corner of Greatorex Street and Hanbury Street two days ago. As he looked puzzled, my Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole colleague could not help wondering out loud as to whether Galloway’s companions too had suddenly landed in the area from another planet.!
I shall publish my Open letter to free George Galloway, on Thursday 4 May 2006.
Back to the noise that the canvassers and touts are making in the area.
All the noise, all the lying! All the running around!
In that order!
No big message
No clear water
No line of difference
No distinction
No measuring of vice against virtue
No morality
No fibre
No flavour
No fire of passion against any real or imaginable enemy of the people.
It is all so dull. So boring,. So very boring.
How can this be democracy!
It is like deadly dead beat!
To paraphrase and apply the key point of the imagery used by one time British Labour leadership contender Denis Healey who mocked his Conservative Party contemporary Geoffrey Howe, being hit by the electioneering words or the campaign in Tower Hamlets around the 4 May 2006 council elections is like being savaged by a political feather duster!
There is no impact. !
There is no substance!
there is no message. !
There is substance vacuum. !
Even the chromosomally young ‘candidates’ are prone to behave like they are septuagenarians!
The heavy air of authority verges ever so slightly on the margins of authoritarianism. !
The glare in their eyes says more of the threat of neo-fascistic contempt for the people. Although their glare might have been acquired from over indulgence in over hasty attempts at recovering from exhaustion by drinking too much!
Or by doing something similar to drink abuse
And for what?
It doesn’t make sense
Not if we look at the very irresposnble behaviour of Janet Ludlow and her pet closet parade of candidates
How did they think they would ever get away with the stunt so outrageous that no sensible person would have done what they have done
Did they think that making a fake DVD containing falsified references to the Khoodeelaar! campaign trigger word would go unnoticed?
Did they think that placing a brazenly conceived stolen image photo of the Khoodeelaar demonstration in a half page advertisement in the East London Idiotiser would remain off the record?
Concealed?
Hidden?
Did they think that this would not bring back memories of Lib Dems Dirty tricks?
Did they think that by including a Khoodeelaar! demonstration picture with the
.
For one thing, it is a stunt that would not fit Janet's party political, career history.
And the facts that we have made formal complaints to the Police against her and her co-colluders, shows that Janet will be having to spend much longer answering our questions and the law’s questions than she would otherwise have to have
Had she behaved honestly
had she behaved decently
Had she behaved with dignity
And this is a serious problem with ‘politicos’
they simply do not come across as having any of those qualities
And sooner or later, they come unstuck and their pretensions slip away
As Janet’s party political pants came off this past week with her shameless launching of a propaganda literature based on her and her Group’s and her party's theft of the Khoodeelaar! campaign event and information and by her criminal falsification of the image that was distorted to bend over in favour of the stooges that she favoured as those same stooges are in awe of the leader of the corrupt clique on Tower Hamkest Council because of the stooges receipt of funds from the Council.
As Janet Ludlow’s political careerist pants came off, they exposed a very petty political interior that has lurked underneath that over-made up exterior of political opportunism! And other utterly greedy facades she has feigned to cultivate over the past 12 years of ignominious performance and rank idiocy and incompetence as an alleged leader of opposition to one of Britain's moist corrupt clique on an inner city Council.
[To be continued]
From the previous [the 9th] edition Wednesday 3 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail-hole-inviting-lies of Janet Ludlow and her closet candidates also promoted by her as ‘Lib Dems’ candidates
LATEST allegations against Ludlow’s pro-CrossRail-hole roles, as confirmed to the Metropolitan police on Wednesday 3 May 2006
The Khoodeelaar! campaign against CrossRail hoe Council has confirmed in statement issued to the Metropolitan Police today Wednesday 3 May 2006 that there are over 20 different items and categories of evidence available which are being made available to the Metropolitan Police against Janet Ludlow’s behaviour and the behaviour of the Lib Deems Group over the Khoodeelaar campaign against Crassrail hole
From the previous, the 8th edition 3 May 2006 :
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail-hole-Tower Hamlets Council! MANIFESTO 2006 COMMWENATRY
By ©Muhammad Haque
1520 Hrs GMT Wednesday 3 May 2006
Elections! What elections?
In the ‘most deprived borough’ of Tower Hamlets, East London, the Council will NOT become a better Council after 4 May 2006 elections.
In fact if the Janet Ludlow and her Lib Dems closet candidates get anywhere near the scope to form any alliance with the Tories or with the corrupt clique of Michael Keith, Tower Hamlets Council will definitely be a lot worse than it has been thus far.
that is a very worrying prospect
The only way that the community in the East End will be defended from the violations of a corrupt sleazy Council is by the people organising to defend of the community.
On all issues that matter
From the formal abuses of the meetings of the Council to the actual, day-to-day behaviour of councillors
Yes, councillors!
Do not be misled by their plastic smiles and bogus sociability today
Remember, they are in it for themselves
If they weren’t, they would not have done what they have done against the community over the past four years
They have lied
They have pretended
They have denied
They have deprived
They have conspired
They have colluded
They have deceived us
They have dismissed the community at every turn
There is no commitment in any of their manifestos, any of their leaflets, any of their brochures to uphold any of the peoples’ rights that have been violated over the past 4 years
There is no evidence whatever of any acknowledgement of the CrossRail hole threat, far less of the pivotal democratising role played by Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole colluding Council and against the CrossRail hole plotting Tony Blair administration at the UK central Government
They have proved that they are out of control, out of bounds from the demands of ethics and morality, of the defined descriptions of democracy.
They are out of sync with morality.
With ethics
With the basic rules the expectations of decent human society and its requirements
They are out for just their owns elves, their petty pathetic careers
They say one thing and they do another
They lie to their colleagues, tell lies about other colleagues and then they pretend that they have done nothing wrong
They place their
They have promised the earth, they have plundered our words
they have suppressed the demands
That is what Janet Ludlow and her lot of closet councillor candidates have done
And that is about the level of behaviour we can expect from all of the rest of them
[To be continued]
From the previous edition :
How KHOODEELAAR! the Brick Lane London E1 area campaign against the CrossRail-hole Tower Hamlets Council shaped the political agenda in December 2005 for the 4 May 2006 elections in Tower HamletsThe power of the truth against the crooks in control of Tower Hamlets Council and their bribed peddlers of Crossrail hole lies
By Muhammad Haque
To VIEW That EAST LONDON IDIOTISER [Thursday 5 January 2006]report about KHOODEELAAR! 2006 Manifesto, CLICK HERE
When I wrote the first substantive parts of the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 in December 2005, I did so in the logical expectation that that manifesto would press home to the crooks in control of Tower Hamlets Council the truth of the campaign determination that we should not let the CrossRail hole pass here.
I had long ago decided to treat the local East London Idiotiser as a parasite publication for me to have any real confidence in it as a journal of record.
That was based on my knowledge of the exceedingly sleazy and immoral behaviour that went on inside the ‘editorial suite’ in what was by then a very shoddy and very obscure ‘only local paper for the borough of Tower Hamlets’ area.
But I received an unexpected message, addressed to the khoodeelaar! legal e-mail address late in December 2005 from a new name on that ‘paper’ seeking to make contacts with the Khoodeelaar campaign.
Why unexpected?
Because I had abandoned the idea that that title had any reporters or ordinarily awake journalists left on it at all
Apparently they had come across the news of the Khoodeelaar! campaign on the internet.
As I knew, they were half awake!
Khoodeelaar! had been publishing all the campaign documents, all the original analyses of the crassly conceived CrossRail hole plan and that of the Crossrail hole Bill [formally presented in the UK House of Commons on 22 February 2005 by Alistair Darling] campaign correspondence and updates on several web sites solidly non-stop since AT LEAST July 2004.
To detail the behaviour of the East London Idiotiser over the previous years that the campaign against Crassrail hole attack had been going on would be revealing of how corrupt all the recognised and the 'respectable' organs of local democracy in the East End of London are and have been.
I shall do that analysis and examination at a later date. Or dates
Back to the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 and what chronologically happened as far a the EAST London Advertiser has been concerned.
In December 2005, I gave them the necessary documentary back up, explained the context and history of the Khoodeelaar! campaign and summarised all the key demands that we had put to the Government and to the local Tower Hamlets Council and emphasised that they [the East London ‘Advertiser’] must remember that I would not overlook any factual errors on their parts far less any lying in the East London Idiotiser for the Crossrail-hole Tower Hamlets Council.
Eventually, they ran a story on the Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Campaign
That was not the first time that our campaign had featured in the East London Idiotiser.
But their previous front page splash on 21 October 2004, had been left inconclusive when I took emergency steps to help change the regime on the paper [Which change did take place – hence the ‘new’ set of ‘staff. More on that phenomenal intervention by KHOODEELAAR! at another time’].
Again, the story of the actual role and the 'journalistic' role as played by or via the East London Idiotiser is a fascinating one about quality of ‘democratic institutions’ in the context of the community’s holding the ‘elected and pubic holders of office to due and manifest accountability.
The Khoodeelaar! No to the Crossrail hole Tower Hamlets Council campaign and the prevaricating role of the East London Idiotiser neatly illustrate the problems that we have here in London’s ‘inner city’ East End before we can say reasonably confidently that we can trust the ‘local institutions' of 'democracy'; and 'legitimate representation' to protect the people and to speak up for the people.
For now, back to the East London Idiotiser’s first report on the Khoodeelaar! manifesto 2006 and the impact that our Manifesto movement has had and will; continue to have beyond tomorrow’s [Thursday 4 May 2006] formal voting.
the On 5 January 2006, the East London Idiotiser carried a piece that was trailed in the streets with a very unavoidable placard.
It shouted out from the placards pasted on walls in the Whitechapel Road that Crossrail was THE issue that would have a decisive impact on the Council elections [that were exactly 4 months off on the day - the trailers were put up late on 4 January 2006].
In the peiec that the paper ran on page 4 [East London Advertiser, Thursday 5 January 2006], the message was unmistakable for the Blairing clique.
The main two-line, 5-word headline solidly said, "CROSSRAIL SCHEME ‘WILL COST LABOUR’ ”.
To any reasonably objective reader of the 4-column piece, it would be very clear indeed that the whole item was based on the Idiotiser’s encountering of undeniable evidence that KHOODEELAAR! was THE campaign against the CrossRail hole.
Although the Iodiser’s newly-announced reporter concerned had not stated it as such in his e-mail contacts seeking information from Khoodeelaar, they had been prompted by the fact that our publications on various web sites of the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto had been widely noticed and accessed.
To view that 5 January 2006 EAST LONDON ADVERTISER piece about the KHOODELAAR! 2006 MANIFESTO, click here. Remember that at no time between 17 January 2006 and 27 April 2006 has the same EAST LONDON ADVERTYISER or its relevant reporter Ted Jeory acknowledged in any of their NEWS pieces the fact that they had in fact themselves admitted in that peiec that it was Khoodeelaar! that was the grassroots campaign against the CrossRail hole assault.
Why they started to apply that untenable amnesia is the subject of the next part of my analysis.
[To be continued]
From the previous, the 3rd edition, published at 1120 Hrs GMT Wednesday 3 May 2006
Why the Khoodeelaar! legal action [which is in process now] against Crossrail hole Bill Minister Alistair Darling is the best way to get him to confess that he lied and that he should not have lied to and in the UK Parliament
By Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area campaign the Crossrail hole Bill, plan, project]
I told Alistair Darling’s CrossRail office on Tuesday [2 May 2006 - at 1600 Hrs GMT] that their latest ‘explanation’ about the existence of parliamentary accountability by the Secretary of State was not at all acceptable.
I said that the routine ritualistic recitations of a list of ‘units’ or states that their communication of yesterday contained, was not at all what I had been after when I demanded that Alistair Darling show what accountability he delivered to Parliament before he decided to make the grant of One hundred million ponds sterling to the CrossRail London railway Ltd [the Crossrail outfit].
[The Full texts of the latest legal demands put to Alistair Darling being put today 3 May 2006 will be reported here later on today]
During December 2005, the UK’s Crossrail hole Bill promoting Minister Alistair Darling gave away one hundred million pounds of the public money to a shadowy, unaccountable outfit plugging for Crassrail assault on the East End.
Darling made that grant available in semi-secret sub-parliamentary in fact almost unparliamentarily and in a sneaky way.
As he has done in his ‘written statement’ of 30 March 2006 following the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail DIRTY hole plan against the East End generally and against the Brick Lane London E1 area in particular.
I first found out about that when I did a check on what he was upto in late December.
And I could not beehive my eyes when I saw that he had made a grant of One hundred million for no reason at all.
I knew that the grant cash would be used to undertake activities that were not explained to parliament.
And when I looked deeper I noticed that the abuse parliament had been done by the application of an unaccountable Section that had been sneaked into a scarcely-debated legislation which was now in 'the statutes Book' as the Railways Act 2005.
It was an Act that had been brought in without any real debate let alone any even awareness of its implications by the so-called Opposition parties or by their MPs
Whenever had Parliament been in a state of uproar about that Act when it must have been at committee stages?
The answer is NEVER>
And the fact that there was no uproar shows that 'democracy' and accountability are mere words of decoration as far as the UK House of Commons goes.
Those words are not meant to be obtained by the official Opposition MPs.
Let alone by the less than official Opposition Lib Dems in the House of Commons
The only elected chamber of the allegedly two-chamber UK parliament.- the frighteningly-promoted 'Mother of Parliaments'!
What a spectacle of inanity the collection of pro-Crossrail MPs made when they took part in the so-called debate held on 19 July 2005.
From the previous edition: 3 May 2006
Tower Hamlets Council ‘poll outcome’ unfathomable, says the Guardian’s pathetically unreliable Patrick Wintour. Why can’t he fathom it? Or for that matter, why can’t the Guardian fathom any morass of immorality that the Blairing corruption of society has produced? Why isn’t the Guardian ever able to fathom any of the degeneration caused by their chums holding office? Why isn’t the Guardian ever able to tell the truth about anything of importance to people in society? How bad is the Guardian as a ‘newspaper’ or news organisation? Why does it keep sucking up to the sleaziest elements in society while pretending to be doing the opposite? Why isn’t there a truthful ‘newspaper’ in Britain?- Crossrail hole Minister Alistair Darling’s Department replies to KHOODEELAAR! legal questions
– update 3 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! evidence against Crossrail-hole-Council Chief Executive Christine Gilbert – an update and analysis 3 May 2006
How to avoid having Janet Ludlow and her pet Liberal Democrats reviving a nightmare regime on Tower Hamlets Council Muhammad Haque political commentary on ‘Why George Galloway must be freed from party bureaucracy to do what he does best – campaign for the causes that he truly believes in’ Where in the LSE [London School of Economics] is their own Jeffrey Archer? And why has the BBC been promoting the LSE’s Jeffrey Archer so fervently? – to be disclosed and discussed in another world exclusive MUHAMMAD HAQUE Political Commentary here, shortly
Why has the ‘sub-local’ ‘newspaper’ ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ done yet another ignorant FrontPage splash? Like its premature and corruptly edited [!} ‘CELEBRATION' headline in the issue published in the last week of March 2006 plugging the lies of Tower Hamlets Council corrupt clique leader Michael Keith and his collection of ethnicity-linked exhibits, the idiotically-edited[!] organ has in its edition published today [3 May 2006] exceeded its own record of stupidity about the area.- An AADHIKARonline dissection of the ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ here shortly
.
From the previous edition: 2200 Hrs GMT Tuesday 2 May 2006
AADHIKARonline London Tuesday 2 May 2006
Exclusive online reporting on the inner state of the inner cities in the Britain fronted by Tony Blair
Why has George Galloway’s RESPECT party published a pledge to work with any party after 4 May 2006?
Why that pledge is proof positive that there will NOT be a better Council after 4 May 2006 in Tower Hamlets
The only way that that can happen is if people stop having any confidence in the corrupt the unethical the lying the self-serving candidates who are now desperately, insanely trying to get our votes.
They are not talking about any principles whatever
The only people talking about principles are the people on the ground.
The people who are not party to any of the cliques that are prodding and prompting and promoting the current crop of candidates, whether or not they are ‘new’ candidates or whether they are old ones.
[To be continued]
From the previous edition: 1900 Hrs GMT Tuesday 2 May 2006
Why I shall not be voting on 4 May 2006
By Muhammad Haque
I am writing this from a location in the Brick Lane London East One area. It is Tower Hamlets borough. One of the most corruptly operated borough councils in the whole country. Even George Galloway has called it the most reprehensible council. And that is assaying something. Given the way Galloway himself has been described in the commentaries in the West.
As I write this at 1855 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 2 May 2006, most of the candidates in the borough are flying on the skies and on levels that are beyond the reaches of ordinary people. Those candidates are not well. They are either sick of losing their seats. Or sick of being exposed as being useless if they fail to get in. Whatever it is that moves them, the election fever is bad for the health. It is worse for the voters. As the outcome will not make Tower Hamlets a better council. Not by the records that I can check.
My voting will hardly change anything. It never could. So I have not been voting for ages. The last time that I attended a polling station, in Tower Hamlets, a lying Lib Dem candidate promised to look into the racist behaviour of one of Tower Hamlets Council’s lying racist staff. He never did. That racist staff had behaved offensively.. It deterred me
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Tower Hamlets Council on the day after the election results are definitively announced
Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail hole-colluding Council has called a demonstration on the first day after the Council elections results are definitely announced, to register the demand for en end to all CrossRail hole collusion and lying by the newly constituted Council.
More details will be published by Khoodeelaar in the next three days
One of the speakers invited to address the Khoodeelaar! Demonstration is local MP George Galloway
Interesting previews on the elections results will also appear about Galloway’s’ RESPECT party and its business-manager-cum-publicist Ron McKay here shortly
from the previous edition published at 1500 Hrs GMT 2 may 2006-05-02
Breaking NEWS latest Khoodeelaar! NO to Crossrail hole campaign complaints to the Electoral Commission against the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems election leaflet and propaganda lies
- Khoodeelaar files complaints against Lib Dems and Janet Ludlow with Electoral commission
- Khoodeelaar reports Janet Ludlow and her agents to the Metropolitan Police
- Khoodeelaar! Demands withdrawal of Lib Dems ‘news’ and falsehood-filled Advertisement
[Fuller reports here during Tuesday 2 May 2006]
How Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dems Group leader Janet Ludlow lied for Crossrail hole-inviting clique and their ethnicity-linked surrogates in the Brick Lane LondonE1 Area
an AADHIKARonline report Tuesday 2 May 2006
Who is the local council ‘politician’ whose main term of ‘political analysis’ has been Bollocks on more than one occasion! Who else but Janet Ludlow, the so-called leader of the Opposition for twelve years on the Tower Hamlets Council.
’Janet Ludlow’s obsession with ‘Bollocks’ is symptomatic of her lack of integrity! Not to say, lack of elegance in political discourse! Which is why she has been caught with her political pants down stealing the image of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CrossRail hole, pilfering the impact of the Khoodeelaar campaign, burgling the message of the Khoodeelaar! No to all crooks and corruption and trying to hide it under her slippery politically opportunistic pants!
Janet Ludlow has misled the community for the past 12 years. She has done this by posing as the Lib Dems group leader, the ‘leader’ of the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Council.
In the 12 years of her misleadership of the opposition, she has failed to oppose. She has refused to Oppose. She has utterly abysmally neglected to oppose.
Her failure, her negligence and her refusal are serious failings.
Failing the whole community in Tower Hamlets.
As many people in Tower Hamlets have suffered bad service, no service, poor service, and disservice because of Janet Ludlow’s lousy loads of Bollocks-obsessed political pretensions.
The worst of those exhibitions came in October 2004 when the Khoodeelaar campaign against CrossRail hole monitored the behaviour of the
From the previous edition Tuesday 2 May 2006
In the aadhikaronline during Tuesday 2 May 2006
- How Tower Hamlets [East London] Council Lib Dems ‘leader’ Janet Ludlow falsified crucial evidence of the Khoodeelaar campaign against CrossRail – how she collude with conspirators to pervert the course of the campaign against Crossrail hole plan- how the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems 'leader' Janet Ludlow defamed key campaign leaders of Khoodeelaar and how the liar Janet then shamelessly participated in the disgraceful decision to use the photo of the very same Khoodeelaar campaigner in a desperate Lib Dumb bid to ingratiate themselves to the community that recognises the Khoodeelaar! Campaign so clearly – Why Janet Ludlow and she personally, prejudicially, pathetically chosen closet pack of Tower Hamlets Lib Dems MUST NOT BE TRUSTED on 4 May 2006
And this is a serious problem with ‘politicos’
they simply do not come across as having any of those qualities
And sooner or later, they come unstuck and their pretensions slip away
As Janet’s party political pants came off this past week with her shameless launching of a propaganda literature based on her and her Group’s and her party's theft of the Khoodeelaar! campaign event and information and by her criminal falsification of the image that was distorted to bend over in favour of the stooges that she favoured as those same stooges are in awe of the leader of the corrupt clique on Tower Hamkest Council because of the stooges receipt of funds from the Council.
As Janet Ludlow’s political careerist pants came off, they exposed a very petty political interior that has lurked underneath that over-made up exterior of political opportunism! And other utterly greedy facades she has feigned to cultivate over the past 12 years of ignominious performance and rank idiocy and incompetence as an alleged leader of opposition to one of Britain's moist corrupt clique on an inner city Council.
[To be continued]
From the previous [the 9th] edition Wednesday 3 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail-hole-inviting-lies of Janet Ludlow and her closet candidates also promoted by her as ‘Lib Dems’ candidates
LATEST allegations against Ludlow’s pro-CrossRail-hole roles, as confirmed to the Metropolitan police on Wednesday 3 May 2006
The Khoodeelaar! campaign against CrossRail hoe Council has confirmed in statement issued to the Metropolitan Police today Wednesday 3 May 2006 that there are over 20 different items and categories of evidence available which are being made available to the Metropolitan Police against Janet Ludlow’s behaviour and the behaviour of the Lib Deems Group over the Khoodeelaar campaign against Crassrail hole
From the previous, the 8th edition 3 May 2006 :
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail-hole-Tower Hamlets Council! MANIFESTO 2006 COMMWENATRY
By ©Muhammad Haque
1520 Hrs GMT Wednesday 3 May 2006
Elections! What elections?
In the ‘most deprived borough’ of Tower Hamlets, East London, the Council will NOT become a better Council after 4 May 2006 elections.
In fact if the Janet Ludlow and her Lib Dems closet candidates get anywhere near the scope to form any alliance with the Tories or with the corrupt clique of Michael Keith, Tower Hamlets Council will definitely be a lot worse than it has been thus far.
that is a very worrying prospect
The only way that the community in the East End will be defended from the violations of a corrupt sleazy Council is by the people organising to defend of the community.
On all issues that matter
From the formal abuses of the meetings of the Council to the actual, day-to-day behaviour of councillors
Yes, councillors!
Do not be misled by their plastic smiles and bogus sociability today
Remember, they are in it for themselves
If they weren’t, they would not have done what they have done against the community over the past four years
They have lied
They have pretended
They have denied
They have deprived
They have conspired
They have colluded
They have deceived us
They have dismissed the community at every turn
There is no commitment in any of their manifestos, any of their leaflets, any of their brochures to uphold any of the peoples’ rights that have been violated over the past 4 years
There is no evidence whatever of any acknowledgement of the CrossRail hole threat, far less of the pivotal democratising role played by Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole colluding Council and against the CrossRail hole plotting Tony Blair administration at the UK central Government
They have proved that they are out of control, out of bounds from the demands of ethics and morality, of the defined descriptions of democracy.
They are out of sync with morality.
With ethics
With the basic rules the expectations of decent human society and its requirements
They are out for just their owns elves, their petty pathetic careers
They say one thing and they do another
They lie to their colleagues, tell lies about other colleagues and then they pretend that they have done nothing wrong
They place their
They have promised the earth, they have plundered our words
they have suppressed the demands
That is what Janet Ludlow and her lot of closet councillor candidates have done
And that is about the level of behaviour we can expect from all of the rest of them
[To be continued]
From the previous edition :
How KHOODEELAAR! the Brick Lane London E1 area campaign against the CrossRail-hole Tower Hamlets Council shaped the political agenda in December 2005 for the 4 May 2006 elections in Tower HamletsThe power of the truth against the crooks in control of Tower Hamlets Council and their bribed peddlers of Crossrail hole lies
By Muhammad Haque
To VIEW That EAST LONDON IDIOTISER [Thursday 5 January 2006]report about KHOODEELAAR! 2006 Manifesto, CLICK HERE
When I wrote the first substantive parts of the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 in December 2005, I did so in the logical expectation that that manifesto would press home to the crooks in control of Tower Hamlets Council the truth of the campaign determination that we should not let the CrossRail hole pass here.
I had long ago decided to treat the local East London Idiotiser as a parasite publication for me to have any real confidence in it as a journal of record.
That was based on my knowledge of the exceedingly sleazy and immoral behaviour that went on inside the ‘editorial suite’ in what was by then a very shoddy and very obscure ‘only local paper for the borough of Tower Hamlets’ area.
But I received an unexpected message, addressed to the khoodeelaar! legal e-mail address late in December 2005 from a new name on that ‘paper’ seeking to make contacts with the Khoodeelaar campaign.
Why unexpected?
Because I had abandoned the idea that that title had any reporters or ordinarily awake journalists left on it at all
Apparently they had come across the news of the Khoodeelaar! campaign on the internet.
As I knew, they were half awake!
Khoodeelaar! had been publishing all the campaign documents, all the original analyses of the crassly conceived CrossRail hole plan and that of the Crossrail hole Bill [formally presented in the UK House of Commons on 22 February 2005 by Alistair Darling] campaign correspondence and updates on several web sites solidly non-stop since AT LEAST July 2004.
To detail the behaviour of the East London Idiotiser over the previous years that the campaign against Crassrail hole attack had been going on would be revealing of how corrupt all the recognised and the 'respectable' organs of local democracy in the East End of London are and have been.
I shall do that analysis and examination at a later date. Or dates
Back to the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 and what chronologically happened as far a the EAST London Advertiser has been concerned.
In December 2005, I gave them the necessary documentary back up, explained the context and history of the Khoodeelaar! campaign and summarised all the key demands that we had put to the Government and to the local Tower Hamlets Council and emphasised that they [the East London ‘Advertiser’] must remember that I would not overlook any factual errors on their parts far less any lying in the East London Idiotiser for the Crossrail-hole Tower Hamlets Council.
Eventually, they ran a story on the Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Campaign
That was not the first time that our campaign had featured in the East London Idiotiser.
But their previous front page splash on 21 October 2004, had been left inconclusive when I took emergency steps to help change the regime on the paper [Which change did take place – hence the ‘new’ set of ‘staff. More on that phenomenal intervention by KHOODEELAAR! at another time’].
Again, the story of the actual role and the 'journalistic' role as played by or via the East London Idiotiser is a fascinating one about quality of ‘democratic institutions’ in the context of the community’s holding the ‘elected and pubic holders of office to due and manifest accountability.
The Khoodeelaar! No to the Crossrail hole Tower Hamlets Council campaign and the prevaricating role of the East London Idiotiser neatly illustrate the problems that we have here in London’s ‘inner city’ East End before we can say reasonably confidently that we can trust the ‘local institutions' of 'democracy'; and 'legitimate representation' to protect the people and to speak up for the people.
For now, back to the East London Idiotiser’s first report on the Khoodeelaar! manifesto 2006 and the impact that our Manifesto movement has had and will; continue to have beyond tomorrow’s [Thursday 4 May 2006] formal voting.
the On 5 January 2006, the East London Idiotiser carried a piece that was trailed in the streets with a very unavoidable placard.
It shouted out from the placards pasted on walls in the Whitechapel Road that Crossrail was THE issue that would have a decisive impact on the Council elections [that were exactly 4 months off on the day - the trailers were put up late on 4 January 2006].
In the peiec that the paper ran on page 4 [East London Advertiser, Thursday 5 January 2006], the message was unmistakable for the Blairing clique.
The main two-line, 5-word headline solidly said, "CROSSRAIL SCHEME ‘WILL COST LABOUR’ ”.
To any reasonably objective reader of the 4-column piece, it would be very clear indeed that the whole item was based on the Idiotiser’s encountering of undeniable evidence that KHOODEELAAR! was THE campaign against the CrossRail hole.
Although the Iodiser’s newly-announced reporter concerned had not stated it as such in his e-mail contacts seeking information from Khoodeelaar, they had been prompted by the fact that our publications on various web sites of the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto had been widely noticed and accessed.
To view that 5 January 2006 EAST LONDON ADVERTISER piece about the KHOODELAAR! 2006 MANIFESTO, click here. Remember that at no time between 17 January 2006 and 27 April 2006 has the same EAST LONDON ADVERTYISER or its relevant reporter Ted Jeory acknowledged in any of their NEWS pieces the fact that they had in fact themselves admitted in that peiec that it was Khoodeelaar! that was the grassroots campaign against the CrossRail hole assault.
Why they started to apply that untenable amnesia is the subject of the next part of my analysis.
[To be continued]
From the previous, the 3rd edition, published at 1120 Hrs GMT Wednesday 3 May 2006
Why the Khoodeelaar! legal action [which is in process now] against Crossrail hole Bill Minister Alistair Darling is the best way to get him to confess that he lied and that he should not have lied to and in the UK Parliament
By Muhammad Haque [Organiser, Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane London E1 area campaign the Crossrail hole Bill, plan, project]
I told Alistair Darling’s CrossRail office on Tuesday [2 May 2006 - at 1600 Hrs GMT] that their latest ‘explanation’ about the existence of parliamentary accountability by the Secretary of State was not at all acceptable.
I said that the routine ritualistic recitations of a list of ‘units’ or states that their communication of yesterday contained, was not at all what I had been after when I demanded that Alistair Darling show what accountability he delivered to Parliament before he decided to make the grant of One hundred million ponds sterling to the CrossRail London railway Ltd [the Crossrail outfit].
[The Full texts of the latest legal demands put to Alistair Darling being put today 3 May 2006 will be reported here later on today]
During December 2005, the UK’s Crossrail hole Bill promoting Minister Alistair Darling gave away one hundred million pounds of the public money to a shadowy, unaccountable outfit plugging for Crassrail assault on the East End.
Darling made that grant available in semi-secret sub-parliamentary in fact almost unparliamentarily and in a sneaky way.
As he has done in his ‘written statement’ of 30 March 2006 following the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail DIRTY hole plan against the East End generally and against the Brick Lane London E1 area in particular.
I first found out about that when I did a check on what he was upto in late December.
And I could not beehive my eyes when I saw that he had made a grant of One hundred million for no reason at all.
I knew that the grant cash would be used to undertake activities that were not explained to parliament.
And when I looked deeper I noticed that the abuse parliament had been done by the application of an unaccountable Section that had been sneaked into a scarcely-debated legislation which was now in 'the statutes Book' as the Railways Act 2005.
It was an Act that had been brought in without any real debate let alone any even awareness of its implications by the so-called Opposition parties or by their MPs
Whenever had Parliament been in a state of uproar about that Act when it must have been at committee stages?
The answer is NEVER>
And the fact that there was no uproar shows that 'democracy' and accountability are mere words of decoration as far as the UK House of Commons goes.
Those words are not meant to be obtained by the official Opposition MPs.
Let alone by the less than official Opposition Lib Dems in the House of Commons
The only elected chamber of the allegedly two-chamber UK parliament.- the frighteningly-promoted 'Mother of Parliaments'!
What a spectacle of inanity the collection of pro-Crossrail MPs made when they took part in the so-called debate held on 19 July 2005.
From the previous edition: 3 May 2006
Tower Hamlets Council ‘poll outcome’ unfathomable, says the Guardian’s pathetically unreliable Patrick Wintour. Why can’t he fathom it? Or for that matter, why can’t the Guardian fathom any morass of immorality that the Blairing corruption of society has produced? Why isn’t the Guardian ever able to fathom any of the degeneration caused by their chums holding office? Why isn’t the Guardian ever able to tell the truth about anything of importance to people in society? How bad is the Guardian as a ‘newspaper’ or news organisation? Why does it keep sucking up to the sleaziest elements in society while pretending to be doing the opposite? Why isn’t there a truthful ‘newspaper’ in Britain?- Crossrail hole Minister Alistair Darling’s Department replies to KHOODEELAAR! legal questions
– update 3 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! evidence against Crossrail-hole-Council Chief Executive Christine Gilbert – an update and analysis 3 May 2006
How to avoid having Janet Ludlow and her pet Liberal Democrats reviving a nightmare regime on Tower Hamlets Council Muhammad Haque political commentary on ‘Why George Galloway must be freed from party bureaucracy to do what he does best – campaign for the causes that he truly believes in’ Where in the LSE [London School of Economics] is their own Jeffrey Archer? And why has the BBC been promoting the LSE’s Jeffrey Archer so fervently? – to be disclosed and discussed in another world exclusive MUHAMMAD HAQUE Political Commentary here, shortly
Why has the ‘sub-local’ ‘newspaper’ ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ done yet another ignorant FrontPage splash? Like its premature and corruptly edited [!} ‘CELEBRATION' headline in the issue published in the last week of March 2006 plugging the lies of Tower Hamlets Council corrupt clique leader Michael Keith and his collection of ethnicity-linked exhibits, the idiotically-edited[!] organ has in its edition published today [3 May 2006] exceeded its own record of stupidity about the area.- An AADHIKARonline dissection of the ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ here shortly
.
From the previous edition :
I said that the routine ritualistic recitations of a list of ‘units’ or states that their communication of yesterday contained, was not at all what I had been after when I demanded that Alistair Darling show what accountability he delivered to Parliament before he decided to make the grant of One hundred million ponds sterling to the CrossRail London railway Ltd [the Crossrail outfit].
[The Full texts of the latest legal demands put to Alistair Darling being put today 3 May 2006 will be reported here later on today]
During December 2005, the UK’s Crossrail hole Bill promoting Minister Alistair Darling gave away one hundred million pounds of the public money to a shadowy, unaccountable outfit plugging for Crassrail assault on the East End.
Darling made that grant available in semi-secret sub-parliamentary in fact almost unparliamentarily and in a sneaky way.
As he has done in his ‘written statement’ of 30 March 2006 following the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail DIRTY hole plan against the East End generally and against the Brick Lane London E1 area in particular.
I first found out about that when I did a check on what he was upto in late December.
And I could not beehive my eyes when I saw that he had made a grant of One hundred million for no reason at all.
I knew that the grant cash would be used to undertake activities that were not explained to parliament.
And when I looked deeper I noticed that the abuse parliament had been done by the application of an unaccountable Section that had been sneaked into a scarcely-debated legislation which was now in 'the statutes Book' as the Railways Act 2005.
It was an Act that had been brought in without any real debate let alone any even awareness of its implications by the so-called Opposition parties or by their MPs
Whenever had Parliament been in a state of uproar about that Act when it must have been at committee stages?
The answer is NEVER>
And the fact that there was no uproar shows that 'democracy' and accountability are mere words of decoration as far as the UK House of Commons goes.
Those words are not meant to be obtained by the official Opposition MPs.
Let alone by the less than official Opposition Lib Dems in the House of Commons
The only elected chamber of the allegedly two-chamber UK parliament.- the frighteningly-promoted 'Mother of Parliaments'!
What a spectacle of inanity the collection of pro-Crossrail MPs made when they took part in the so-called debate held on 19 July 2005.
From the previous edition: 3 May 2006
Tower Hamlets Council ‘poll outcome’ unfathomable, says the Guardian’s pathetically unreliable Patrick Wintour. Why can’t he fathom it? Or for that matter, why can’t the Guardian fathom any morass of immorality that the Blairing corruption of society has produced? Why isn’t the Guardian ever able to fathom any of the degeneration caused by their chums holding office? Why isn’t the Guardian ever able to tell the truth about anything of importance to people in society? How bad is the Guardian as a ‘newspaper’ or news organisation? Why does it keep sucking up to the sleaziest elements in society while pretending to be doing the opposite? Why isn’t there a truthful ‘newspaper’ in Britain?
- Crossrail hole Minister Alistair Darling’s Department replies to KHOODEELAAR! legal questions
–update 3 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! evidence against Crossrail-hole-Council Chief Executive Christine Gilbert – an update and analysis 3 May 2006
.
From the previous edition: 2200 Hrs GMT Tuesday 2 May 2006
AADHIKARonline London Tuesday 2 May 2006
Exclusive online reporting on the inner state of the inner cities in the Britain fronted by Tony Blair
Why has George Galloway’s RESPECT party published a pledge to work with any party after 4 May 2006?
Why that pledge is proof positive that there will NOT be a better Council after 4 May 2006 in Tower Hamlets
The only way that that can happen is if people stop having any confidence in the corrupt the unethical the lying the self-serving candidates who are now desperately, insanely trying to get our votes.
They are not talking about any principles whatever
The only people talking about principles are the people on the ground.
The people who are not party to any of the cliques that are prodding and prompting and promoting the current crop of candidates, whether or not they are ‘new’ candidates or whether they are old ones.
[To be continued]
From the previous edition: 1900 Hrs GMT Tuesday 2 May 2006
Why I shall not be voting on 4 May 2006
By Muhammad Haque
I am writing this from a location in the Brick Lane London East One area. It is Tower Hamlets borough. One of the most corruptly operated borough councils in the whole country. Even George Galloway has called it the most reprehensible council. And that is assaying something. Given the way Galloway himself has been described in the commentaries in the West.
As I write this at 1855 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 2 May 2006, most of the candidates in the borough are flying on the skies and on levels that are beyond the reaches of ordinary people. Those candidates are not well. They are either sick of losing their seats. Or sick of being exposed as being useless if they fail to get in. Whatever it is that moves them, the election fever is bad for the health. It is worse for the voters. As the outcome will not make Tower Hamlets a better council. Not by the records that I can check.
My voting will hardly change anything. It never could. So I have not been voting for ages. The last time that I attended a polling station, in Tower Hamlets, a lying Lib Dem candidate promised to look into the racist behaviour of one of Tower Hamlets Council’s lying racist staff. He never did. That racist staff had behaved offensively.. It deterred me
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Tower Hamlets Council on the day after the election results are definitively announced
Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail hole-colluding Council has called a demonstration on the first day after the Council elections results are definitely announced, to register the demand for en end to all CrossRail hole collusion and lying by the newly constituted Council.
More details will be published by Khoodeelaar in the next three days
One of the speakers invited to address the Khoodeelaar! Demonstration is local MP George Galloway
Interesting previews on the elections results will also appear about Galloway’s’ RESPECT party and its business-manager-cum-publicist Ron McKay here shortly
from the previous edition published at 1500 Hrs GMT 2 may 2006-05-02
Breaking NEWS latest Khoodeelaar! NO to Crossrail hole campaign complaints to the Electoral Commission against the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems election leaflet and propaganda lies
- Khoodeelaar files complaints against Lib Dems and Janet Ludlow with Electoral commission
- Khoodeelaar reports Janet Ludlow and her agents to the Metropolitan Police
- Khoodeelaar! Demands withdrawal of Lib Dems ‘news’ and falsehood-filled Advertisement
[Fuller reports here during Tuesday 2 May 2006]
How Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dems Group leader Janet Ludlow lied for Crossrail hole-inviting clique and their ethnicity-linked surrogates in the Brick Lane LondonE1 Area
an AADHIKARonline report Tuesday 2 May 2006
Who is the local council ‘politician’ whose main term of ‘political analysis’ has been Bollocks on more than one occasion! Who else but Janet Ludlow, the so-called leader of the Opposition for twelve years on the Tower Hamlets Council.
’Janet Ludlow’s obsession with ‘Bollocks’ is symptomatic of her lack of integrity! Not to say, lack of elegance in political discourse! Which is why she has been caught with her political pants down stealing the image of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CrossRail hole, pilfering the impact of the Khoodeelaar campaign, burgling the message of the Khoodeelaar! No to all crooks and corruption and trying to hide it under her slippery politically opportunistic pants!
Janet Ludlow has misled the community for the past 12 years. She has done this by posing as the Lib Dems group leader, the ‘leader’ of the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Council.
In the 12 years of her misleadership of the opposition, she has failed to oppose. She has refused to Oppose. She has utterly abysmally neglected to oppose.
Her failure, her negligence and her refusal are serious failings.
Failing the whole community in Tower Hamlets.
As many people in Tower Hamlets have suffered bad service, no service, poor service, and disservice because of Janet Ludlow’s lousy loads of Bollocks-obsessed political pretensions.
The worst of those exhibitions came in October 2004 when the Khoodeelaar campaign against CrossRail hole monitored the behaviour of the
From the previous edition Tuesday 2 May 2006
In the aadhikaronline during Tuesday 2 May 2006
- How Tower Hamlets [East London] Council Lib Dems ‘leader’ Janet Ludlow falsified crucial evidence of the Khoodeelaar campaign against CrossRail – how she collude with conspirators to pervert the course of the campaign against Crossrail hole plan- how the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems 'leader' Janet Ludlow defamed key campaign leaders of Khoodeelaar and how the liar Janet then shamelessly participated in the disgraceful decision to use the photo of the very same Khoodeelaar campaigner in a desperate Lib Dumb bid to ingratiate themselves to the community that recognises the Khoodeelaar! Campaign so clearly – Why Janet Ludlow and she personally, prejudicially, pathetically chosen closet pack of Tower Hamlets Lib Dems MUST NOT BE TRUSTED on 4 May 2006
The only way that that can happen is if people stop having any confidence in the corrupt the unethical the lying the self-serving candidates who are now desperately, insanely trying to get our votes.
They are not talking about any principles whatever
The only people talking about principles are the people on the ground.
The people who are not party to any of the cliques that are prodding and prompting and promoting the current crop of candidates, whether or not they are ‘new’ candidates or whether they are old ones.
[To be continued]
By Muhammad Haque
As I write this at 1855 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 2 May 2006, most of the candidates in the borough are flying on the skies and on levels that are beyond the reaches of ordinary people. Those candidates are not well. They are either sick of losing their seats. Or sick of being exposed as being useless if they fail to get in. Whatever it is that moves them, the election fever is bad for the health. It is worse for the voters. As the outcome will not make Tower Hamlets a better council. Not by the records that I can check.
My voting will hardly change anything. It never could. So I have not been voting for ages. The last time that I attended a polling station, in Tower Hamlets, a lying Lib Dem candidate promised to look into the racist behaviour of one of Tower Hamlets Council’s lying racist staff. He never did. That racist staff had behaved offensively.. It deterred me
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail hole-colluding Council has called a demonstration on the first day after the Council elections results are definitely announced, to register the demand for en end to all CrossRail hole collusion and lying by the newly constituted Council.
More details will be published by Khoodeelaar in the next three days
One of the speakers invited to address the Khoodeelaar! Demonstration is local MP George Galloway
Interesting previews on the elections results will also appear about Galloway’s’ RESPECT party and its business-manager-cum-publicist Ron McKay here shortly
from the previous edition published at 1500 Hrs GMT 2 may 2006-05-02
Breaking NEWS latest Khoodeelaar! NO to Crossrail hole campaign complaints to the Electoral Commission against the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems election leaflet and propaganda lies
- Khoodeelaar files complaints against Lib Dems and Janet Ludlow with Electoral commission
- Khoodeelaar reports Janet Ludlow and her agents to the Metropolitan Police
- Khoodeelaar! Demands withdrawal of Lib Dems ‘news’ and falsehood-filled Advertisement
[Fuller reports here during Tuesday 2 May 2006]
How Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dems Group leader Janet Ludlow lied for Crossrail hole-inviting clique and their ethnicity-linked surrogates in the Brick Lane LondonE1 Area
an AADHIKARonline report Tuesday 2 May 2006
Who is the local council ‘politician’ whose main term of ‘political analysis’ has been Bollocks on more than one occasion! Who else but Janet Ludlow, the so-called leader of the Opposition for twelve years on the Tower Hamlets Council.
’Janet Ludlow’s obsession with ‘Bollocks’ is symptomatic of her lack of integrity! Not to say, lack of elegance in political discourse! Which is why she has been caught with her political pants down stealing the image of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CrossRail hole, pilfering the impact of the Khoodeelaar campaign, burgling the message of the Khoodeelaar! No to all crooks and corruption and trying to hide it under her slippery politically opportunistic pants!
Janet Ludlow has misled the community for the past 12 years. She has done this by posing as the Lib Dems group leader, the ‘leader’ of the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Council.
In the 12 years of her misleadership of the opposition, she has failed to oppose. She has refused to Oppose. She has utterly abysmally neglected to oppose.
Her failure, her negligence and her refusal are serious failings.
Failing the whole community in Tower Hamlets.
As many people in Tower Hamlets have suffered bad service, no service, poor service, and disservice because of Janet Ludlow’s lousy loads of Bollocks-obsessed political pretensions.
The worst of those exhibitions came in October 2004 when the Khoodeelaar campaign against CrossRail hole monitored the behaviour of the
Breaking NEWS latest Khoodeelaar! NO to Crossrail hole campaign complaints to the Electoral Commission against the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems election leaflet and propaganda lies
- Khoodeelaar files complaints against Lib Dems and Janet Ludlow with Electoral commission
- Khoodeelaar reports Janet Ludlow and her agents to the Metropolitan Police
- Khoodeelaar! Demands withdrawal of Lib Dems ‘news’ and falsehood-filled Advertisement
[Fuller reports here during Tuesday 2 May 2006]
’Janet Ludlow’s obsession with ‘Bollocks’ is symptomatic of her lack of integrity! Not to say, lack of elegance in political discourse! Which is why she has been caught with her political pants down stealing the image of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CrossRail hole, pilfering the impact of the Khoodeelaar campaign, burgling the message of the Khoodeelaar! No to all crooks and corruption and trying to hide it under her slippery politically opportunistic pants!
In the 12 years of her misleadership of the opposition, she has failed to oppose. She has refused to Oppose. She has utterly abysmally neglected to oppose.
Her failure, her negligence and her refusal are serious failings.
Failing the whole community in Tower Hamlets.
As many people in Tower Hamlets have suffered bad service, no service, poor service, and disservice because of Janet Ludlow’s lousy loads of Bollocks-obsessed political pretensions.
The worst of those exhibitions came in October 2004 when the Khoodeelaar campaign against CrossRail hole monitored the behaviour of the
From the previous edition Tuesday 2 May 2006
In the aadhikaronline during Tuesday 2 May 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole-colluding Janet Ludlow - update on legal action and claims against Janet Ludlow and her co-colluders for the CrossRail hole lies and attacks
AADHIKARonline news service in defence of the communities in the inner cities in the UK. This page is dedicated to support the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole attack on the East End of London generally and the Brick Lane London E1 area in particular.
To VIEW That EAST LONDON IDIOTISER [Thursday 5 January 2006]report about KHOODEELAAR! 2006 Manifesto, CLICK HERE
Why Khoodeelaar! Has invited George Galloway to attend the next Khoodeelaar! demonstration against CrossRail-hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council – on 5 May 2006 or on the first day after the definitive, constitutional law, election law publication of the full election results for Tower Hamlets Council
Why the Tower Hamlets Conservative ‘leader’ Shahgir Bakth Faruk lied about the ‘private conservative meeting’ on 24 April 2006 when in fact the meeting he was talking about was not a private one. It was a public meeting and it was one to which all the local ethnicity-linked papers were invited. As many as four media workers from the local, English language weekly the East London Advertiser and an allied organisation.
Who got Shahgir Bakth Faruk to lie to the Khoodeelaaronline editor about that event? And what are the implications of the lies he told? Why Khoodeelaar! is urging voters in the East End to NOT TRUST ANY LYING Party no matter what the name or the self-description or the formal 'manifesto' pretensions of the lying party or grouping say it [the lying party or grouping concerned] will 'do if you vote for it'. DO NOT VOTE for ANY LIARS on 4 May 2006...
- Why Tower Hamlets Council ‘leader’ Helal Uddin Abbas lied when he accused un-named people of having lied about him when Abbas spoke meaninglessly at the Khoodeelaar! campaign against CrossRail hole public gathering on 22 January 2006.
- Who will audit Christine Gilbert, chief executive of Tower Hamlets Council, given an undeserved CBE by Tony Blair in January 2006 and married to Home Office minister Tony McNulty? – a report shortly
From the previous edition:- Who is funding the ‘Independent’ candidates in Tower Hamlets and anywhere else in the UK for that matter
- Who funds the ‘ethnicity-linked’ groups based at the ‘community centres’? Who are these groups and to whom are they accountable?
- Who told the Council that we needed the packs of lies under covers of Local Area Partnerships? Who are these ‘partners’? Are there crimes being committed under the guises of LAPs? And if there are, why haven’t there been prosecutions?
- With the BBC now acknowledging that the vote fraud and corruption regime is out of control in Tower Hamlets and with George Galloway’s long time business partner and RESPECT spokesman making a contribution to the BBC Radio 4 Today programme in the past ten minutes about Tower Hamlets Council vote fraud, the scene is set for massive abuse in the Borough even after the scheduled 4 May Council elections.
No matter who is in control, there is utter disbelief on the part of ordinary people in the Borough at the way the Council is descending into deeper depths of sleaze and corruption.
Bridget Prentice, the elections minister speaking now on the Today programme’s John Humphrys is making incredible utterances of protestations ..
She is not taking responsibility for the fraud that took place in Tower Hamlets last year over the 5 may 2005 general elections.
So the question aadhikaronline is asking throughout this 'May Day bank holiday weekend' is: Who will hold a post election Tower Hamlets Council to account?- an aadhikaronline report - Why is Oona King reportedly making such an open deal with the Lib Dems in Bow East? How deep do the roots of the deal go? Will Oona King ‘revive’ her own political career in Tower Hamlets via the blossoming career as a councillor of her as-yet-unnamed favourite candidate in the Bow East council seat?
- Did they have to abuse the Friday congregation prayer-goers in the mosque in Tower Hamlets so brazenly with their ‘pray-for-the candidates’ routine on 28 April 2006, barely a week before the 4 May scheduled local elections? Would they have also prayed for a prosperous career for every single adulterer, liar, interest-taker, and alcohol-user?
Those latter categories often feature in the actual speeches and sharia discussions within the Muslim community.
So, whose idea is it to corrupt the sanctity of the mosque by openly turning the congregations into captive audiences for spiels for some of the most undesirable elements that are known in the community?
Or are we witnessing in the inner cities in Britain the Blair-regime’s encouragement of a sleazy version of the ‘political imam’ who is as corrupted as any characterisations of Abu Hamza has been found to have been justifiable on the facts? I-an aadhikaronline investigative report here shortly
From the previous edition of aadhikaronline published ion Friday 28 April2006 - Who will speak for the RESPECT 'councillors' if they are in a position to become the focus of attention resulting from the 4 May 2006 elections in Tower Hamlets?
Will it be George Galloway’s business partner Ron McKay?
Or will there be a democratically constituted body that will answer to the people for the behaviour of Ron McKay?
What lies behind Ron McKay's assumption that he knows more about Tower Hamlets than the local people do?
And is his nervousness at being asked questions about the actual manifesto of the RESPECT 'party' anything to do with the fact that there is an atmosphere of really serious and fundamental problems within the RESPECT 'coalition'?-an aadhikaronline investigation [report due here in the very near future] - Who has sent the former Tower Hamlets Labour Party Local Government Committee into permanent exile?
Why won’t the chair and the secretary of the former Tower Hamlets labour Party Local Government Committee speak out against the sleaze the corruption, the illegalities, the careerism that they witnessed as they ‘observed’ the behaviour of the ‘leader’ of the ‘labour Group’ on Tower Hamlets Council during 2002-2005? - Why are there so much postal voting and other vote-related corruption and abuses in the East End borough of Tower Hamlets?
Why didn’t Christine Gilbert, the ‘returning officer’ in post in Tower Hamlets, resign after she was publicly described by George Galloway as being responsible for the disastrous electoral fraud that occurred during the 5 May 2005 [a year ago] general elections ?
Who decided that Christine Gilbert was a morally fit person to be given an Honour by Tony Blair? - Monitoring the morality show in the UK
who has been plugging away for Margaret Hodge, the peddler for the ‘BNP threat’ as described by Bethnal Green and Bow MP George Galloway? And why should the London DAILY MAIL suddenly discover that the BBC has been lying to the public? Will the Daily Mail continue to argue for accountability from the BBC after the 4 May 2006 council elections? And, by the way, why is the Daily Mail never found guilty of many wrongdoings by the Press Complaints Commission? - Why does PRIVATE EYE shield and protect all those unaccountable local Councils in the UK? And whatever happened to their 2003 ‘discovery’ of Tower Hamlets as one of the UK’s sleaziest, rottenest Borough Councils? Is the PRIVATE EYE suspension of any examination of the corruption that goes on in most local councils in any way linked with the fact that the ‘writers’ have personal links with so many involved directly or indirectly in the corruption institutions that are the bureaucracies in these Councils? And when was the last time that PRIVATE EYE did any investigation into the biggest spending publicly funded bodies in the UK? If the answer is NOT recently then the question surely must be: why not? ‘Shurely’ we should be told
- Who pays for the printing and the districting of so many ‘Bangla language’ ‘whosepapers’ published from addresses in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets?
- Who was behind the latest ‘Bengali TV’ channel attacks on the Bangladeshis ion the UK?
Evidence of Tower Hamlets Councillors lying for CrossRail hole before the 22 January 2006, after the 22 January 20067 and even now, on Tuesday 2 January 2006.
Why the campaign against CrossRail hole is also a campaign against corruption, lying by councillors and the corruption misuse and waste by all their lying colluding ‘Opposition’ councillors and the Council’s employees.
Only the community campaign against the CrossRail hole and similar democratising and uncareerist mobilisation can defend ten community after 4 May 2006 and can also significantly help defeat the liars who have been making crossrail-hole-inviting decisions, utterances, endorsements, contacts, contracts, deals, concessions, consents [as in planning] plots, links and their successor liars who will be occupying th positions of making decisions in our name after the results are announced of the scheduled 4 May 2006 elections for Tower Hamlets Council.
From the previous edition, published on Monday 1 May 2006:Further evidence of wrongdoing and corruption for Crossrail hole-plot against the Brick Lane London E1 area and the perversion of the democratic process by Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dems Group leadership
Part 2
By Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crassrail hole-plotting Tower Hamlets Council
The historic significance of the Khoodeelaar! Motion as spoken by Muhammad Haque and as supported unanimously by the meeting at the Brady Centre
in the Hanbury Street on Sunday 22 January 2006
Was that motion significant?
The answer is Yes.
Was that historic
The answer is Yes.
Was that so significant that I can say it was so even though it was I who had spoken it?
Yes.
Why?
The answer is that because it was
For more than a hundred years before that, local people across what is now called the Borough of Tower Hamlets, had been labelled as being less able than their counterparts elsewhere in London to articulate their own demands.
What is worse, The East End of London had been consigned to a permanent slot in the dustbin of democratic assertiveness.
Everything that was done on or in the East End was usually said to be ‘done for the East End’ by others.
Eastenders ourselves were not capable of doing anything for us!
That was pretty much the norm.
And the norm included the record of the Polar Councillors, whose most famed member was of course George Lansbury’s. Those councillors went to jail to defend their community.
What a difference there is between the two incidents.
On 22 January 2006, the Brady centre Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole colluding Council meeting was on the moral high ground.
As against the Tower Hamlets Council who were assigned the lowest possible ground imaginable
[To be continued]
From the previous edition: Bank holiday Monday 1 May 2006 :
The damning evidence against Janet Ludlow’s Lib Dems Group on Tower Hamlets Council as obtained by the investigative members and supporters of KHOODEELAAR! the campaign against a Crossrail-hole Tower Hamlets Council. Khoodeelaar! is gearing up to confront any CrossRail-hole-bent Tower Hamlets Council that may result from any sepohological flukes on 5 May 2006! Here aadhikaronline starts the report on Why Janet Ludlow and the Liberal Democrats 'she has led' on Tower Hamlets Council do not deserve to be trusted at the 4 May 2006 council elections in Tower Hamlets- A special aadhikaronline report
[Part1]
By Muhammad Haque
1330 Hrs GMT / 1430 Hrs Uktime London Monday 1 May 2006
With the unravelling of the sleazy and undignified petty careers of Charles Clarke and John Prescott taking too long to be complete and over with, the ‘Nation’ in Britain is not keen really to welcome in its political arms the ‘alternative’ ‘leader’ Menzies Campbell.
He made a belated call for Clarke to go.
I had already derided his party’s spokesman Simon Hughes as politically inept for his little part in the Charles Clarke package as shown on Saturday by the BBC TV news.
Why then are the Lib Dems so dumb?
They are dumb because they are, more often than not, in the grips of very dumb people.
But that is not an evidential illogicality when it comes to dissecting the politically Dumb British Lib Democrats.
And the dumbness is nowhere more staggeringly unmistakably on display than in the awful mess that is called the Janet Ludlow ‘loadership’ of the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems.
They do not show initiative.
They do not come across as either coherent or consistent .
They most certainly do not come across as representing principles.
Janet Ludlow has been in the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems Group for more than a century.
That is how long it feels to long suffering observers of the spectacle of a dumbing-downwards loadership of a politically insignificant Liberal Democrats Group on Tower Hamlets Council.
br>And what has she to show for it?
Not much
Except a political adviser who is so bereft of awareness of life in the community that she sent to the Khoodeelaar! organisation a memo which must go down in history as a classic piece of evidence of how the Lib Dumbs became so dumb
So how come that the same Janet Ludlow has been appearing as a revived figure, as if she were an Egyptian Mummy who has been brought back to life to be included in a desperately dishonestly conjured up series of propaganda sheets!
Janet Ludlow is seen featuring in a party political election propaganda scheme as if she is actually involved in the Khoodeelaar!! campaign against CrossRail hole attack on the East End! Khoodeelaar! Is the most vibrant community-created campaign of the last One hundred years in the East End! I should know just how wrong and dishonest that audacious immoral act of petty party political opportunism and lying by Janet Ludlow’s LOADERSHIP is!
For three years I have done nothing else but to organise the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crassrail assault on the East End.>
For three years, I have wondered what the Lib Dems on Tower Hamlets Council were getting upto.
For three years, I have waited to hear a single one of them come forward and show in one breath, an awareness and an ability to acknowledge the existence of the Khoodeelaar! Movement and to identify with this campaign in courageous and constitutional opposition to the crass CrossRail hole attack plan against the East End that has been underway with the active collusion of the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
All the Khoodeelaar! campaign supporters have shared my amazement at the utter absence politically of the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems from the scene of the campaign against the CrossRail hole.
Until 22 January 2006!
[To be continued]
From the Previous edition:
J K Galbraith - why the BBC must apologise for that LSE-Desai outrage
MUHAMMAD HAQUE daily political commentary
0900 Hrs GMT London Monday 1 May 2006
The world has lost a great contributor to caring and civilised thought. J K Galbraith has passed away.
I will always remember him for the great service he performed by explaining to the world so clearly how the Military Industrial Complex operates.
But the BBC are not content to let the memories of one of the most active social thinkers remain untarnished.
they brought in one of the most embarrassing emblems of ethnicity-linked careerism, a man they described as ‘emeritus professor’, and addressed as ‘Lord Desai’.
He does not deserve the BBC’s promotion. Let alone complicity in the awful insult he heaped on the just-deceased thinker. Desai compared Galbraith with the British faker and convicted criminal Jeffrey Archer!
We the licence payers have something to say about the BBC’s choice of ‘work’ which they spend our money on that ‘work’, that interview with the ignoramus Desai, constituted neither work, nor service.
Is there no end to the idiocies at the heart of the BBC?
Or, to be precise, at the heart of the Radio Four Today programme?
The Radio Four Today programme broadcast an alleged interview with one of the UK’s most corrupt and ignorant ‘professors’, linked with the London School of Economics [LSE], who exhibited once again just how pathetically backward and sewer-like the world of Big Business academia is.
In the alleged interview, the LSE-linked ignoramus Professor Desai displayed his own total ignorance of the discipline of economics and what is more he showed just how deeply sunk in the mire of selfishness, greed and corruption he himself was.
He dismissed JK Galbraith as an economist and then sang the praise of Market capitalism, globalisation in the most shameless way possible. He then said that he never liked Galbraith, anyway!
The licence payers of the UK must demand to know why our licence paying money is being wasted and misused by the BBC giving airtime to such completely bad elements who spread the gospel of capitalist uncare, discare where there should be much more space and time given to the propagation of the truth about our world and how the truly liberating ideas of educators must be at the centre of our knowledge about events.
The ignoramus Desai is not any description of source for anything remotely to do with the truth. He is a fabricator and the BBC should know better than to allow a practised fabricator and surrogate to be given any platform where only the truth about capitalism will be acceptable. No room for lies. For to allow any lies about economics to be aired as if it has any backing of scholarship would be to violate the rights of so many millions whose very existence is threatened and denied by the oppressive gospel of market economics and capitalism.
Galbraith’s contributions included the fact that he brought out into the open some of the crucial evidence about how the corrupt market capitalism – and Globalisation in today’s terminology- operates. In the society that is dominated by the worlds vilest violators of human rights.
If nothing else, that achievement by Galbraith was much more significant than the stupid LSE Desai has any ability to recognise.
The question is: what agenda was the BBC Radio Four editor or programme commissioners operating under?
Did they have to bring in that ignorance spreader Desai?
Why did they have to broadcast that sickeningly ignorant string of lies by the LSE moron Desai?
Since when had that punter become a source of anything to do with civilised discourse? Let alone of anything to do with the truth about this world and how the gospel of free market economic lies has been sued to violate and massacre millions?
How dare the BBC let the LSE moron Desai utter stupidities about J K Galbraith?
What does Desai know about Economics?
Ed Stourton should now be renamed Ed Stupidone for his own stupidities in conducting that unforgivably ignorant interview giving undeserved airtime to this LSE-linked peddler of corruption and Big Business perversion of the wealth of nature and the wealth of societies.
A transcript of the BBC Radio Four idiotic interview with LSE moron Desai going on at the just-deceased economist and social condemnatory J K Galbraith will be published here shortly
This filed 0915 Hrs GMT
Monday 1` May 2006
From the previous edition :
AADHIKARonline PUBLISHING LAW note at 2120 Hrs GMT
Due to the Khoodeelaar! campaign taking legal action against the Tower Hamlets Liberal Democratic Group, the scheduled aadhikaronline feature about the Liberal Democratic councillor Louise Alexander and her blogs, has been postponed indefinitely.
That feature would have appeared here at 2350 Hrs GMT on Sunday 30 April 2006.
That publication will not now go ahead as the contents involved would include materials that are now being presented to the High Court in the action by Khoodeelaar! against Janet Ludlow and her Liberal Democratic Group on Tower Hamlets Council.
Aadhikaronline legal note: 2120 Hrs GMT
2220 Hrs UKtime
Sunday 30 April 2006
From the previous edition :< br>
The 3rd Edition AADHIKARonline London 1330 Hrs GMT / 1430 Hrs Sunday 30 April 2006
Why Janet Ludlow the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dem Group leader [opposition councillor] is being issued with court action notice by Khoodeelaar! this week and the relevance of the EVIDENCE from the past elections to Tower Hamlets Council – the worrying legacies of the Liberal Democrats 1990-1994 [Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs]
Full report here shortly [This filed 1330 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006]
From the previous, the 2nd
Edition :
Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs
How in Tower Hamlets, any consequence of an electoral fluke, resulting in Lib Dems getting any say on how the Council is run, will cause serious problems and lose the community vital support at a time when the East End needs a Council made up of honest people who are actually actively opposed to liars and lying in public office!
By Muhammad Haque
London 1100 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
Yet they could bring changes for the better.
If they had good people standing as candidates.
More importantly, if they had good people standing with good prospects of getting elected/
There are all across London good people about.
May be not as many of them who are willing to stand under those circumstances as there should be but there are enough of them that could really make a difference if they were among the people on elected councils in London after the 4 May scheduled polls.
But the present political parties, groupings and the consequent system of elections do not want good people. running local councils in London
Tony Blair does not want them
None of Blair’s ministers wants them
And the Odiously Parasitic Department's Minister John Prescott would not definitely want them
So, come 5 May 2006 in the euphoria and mad rush for photocells, celebrations and the odd neo-fascistic grabbing of the headlines, there will be a great deal to mourn in London.
The loss of an opportunity to stop at least some of the crooks and thieves robbing the people of our rights.
Those thieves may be smaller in size and in terms of the individual access they would have to the vaults of our freedoms than their counterparts to be found in the inflated egos of the ministers included in Blair’s current entourage
. But looting – ‘voting’ ‘in cabinet’ and ‘in committee’ together, those crooks posing and ‘conducting’ as elected councillors will represent a very serious threat to liberties and the properties of the people in the communities covered by their councils.
Just as the crooks in control of the Tower Hamlets Council did during the five years of the INVITING of the CrossRail hole threat to the East End of London, 2000-2005.
Does it mean that the removal of that clique of crooks on 4 May 2006 by the voters, would usher in a morally clean group of councillors?
It does not.
How?
Because we have already seen the evidence of their immorality, their ingratitude to the community even before the last week before the scheduled polling day has run out
Some of them are already changing their gaits, the demeanours and their ways of addressing people in the community
They are behaving as if they are due for something like a coronation and the only thing that remains to be done is for the final finishing touches to be applied to the thrones!
Their heads are bigger than even Brenda could make her’s look on an especially good day based on her 60 plus years of experience of carrying the ‘right’ to sit in a real thrown.
In the Brick Lane London E1 area where the political heat surrounding the 4 May 2006 elections was actually launched at the end of December 2005 by the Khoodeelaar! 2006 election Manifesto, every single ‘legit’ party and candidate has had a pad.
This has been either in the form of a particular eating house – a Brick Lane Curry house- or a café or a similar, business location.
So vital is the place of Brick Lane in the political locations list. Locations to be seen at
Even the Isle of Dogs-bent property takeoverwallhas , the Conservatives, have been able to sneak into Brick Lane and pretend to be ‘friends’ with elements that have feigned enough abilities to give out ethnicity-linked noise that they [these Conservatives] have convinced themselves that they are on the way to taking over the democratic centre of the East End borough of Tower Hamlets.
If not in their own elected rights then by an actively encouraged alliance with the sub-Conservatives who are now expectantly moving nearer to the centre of a collation with the Conservatives to control Tower Hamlets
The Ies of Dogs estate-agents-Conservatives have no problem in dismissing the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
They know that they can do this by openly
[To be continued]
From the previous edition published at 0April 2006>/April 2006>/ Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
The Muhammad Haque daily Political Commentary
Why I had described Prescott’s Odiously Parasitical Department …..
By Muhammad Haque
0750 Hrs GMT 0850 Hrs UK time Sunday 30 April 2006
My battle against john Prescott centred on two factors.
His moral bankruptcy and his incredible stupidity about what the Labour Party was about
Those would take another 25 years to be recognised by the Mail on Sunday and by everybody else.
Everybody else that is occupying a place or similar in the mass propaganda, media business.
But the Mail on Sunday has already messed up any remnants of a moral message arising from the Prescott adulterous irresponsibility.
Prescott, like the conniving corrupting Charles Clarke, Prescott’s cabinet colleague and fellow travelling time-server in public office, has always been a bogus member of ‘the movement’.
He is petty, small-minded and has always lacked the basic depth that he must have had if he warranted being taken seriously as a true and trusted champion of the people whose lives literally depended on the deeds and or more likely the misdeeds of people like Prescott occupying positions of public authority and ‘power’ in the country.
I had asked him to explain one of the hundreds of contradictions in the then Labour regime in the UK.
It was about fiddling the official statistics and I asked him to explain why the official statistics on joblessness were being fiddled>
I assumed that he would direct his officials to address the details, as I knew that he lacked the necessary abilities to do that himself but I did know that even he knew the meaning and the implications for ‘democracy’ of the unacceptability, even in the context of the 1970s Britain, of fiddling the figures.
Prescott’s reply was staggeringly stupid.
And it missed the point
As always Prescott misses the main picture
That is why, more than 20 years since my previous attempt at getting him to tell the straight facts about Government behaviour I came across the fact that he was back in office and that his office had been given the shorthand name of ODPM. I immediately described his Department’s acronym ODPM as the ODiously Parasitical Moron’s Department [and permutations to similar effects]
The shocking truth about the UK political system [!!!] is NOT that there is no moral authority from the people in the country for the likes of Prescott to be in public office.
Th shocking truth is that the likes of Prescott are ALLOWED to get into public office.
And that they are even revered! Whilst holding those offices
The ‘revelations’ only leak out by default
The political system in Britain is a thoroughly corrupt immoral system
It is an opportunistic, insensitive,, uncaring, unethical system that will only be replaced by anything remotely resembling an ethical, moral one when the inevitable critical convergence occurs between all the crooked couriers of careeristic missions and manifestos
Even in the Mail on Sunday today [Sunday 30 April 2006]
there are paragraphs and paragraphs of plugs for the ‘wonderful boss’ that John Prescott alleged was.
And this is being attributed to Mac Clifford’s latest prize cash-machine –Tracey Temple, whom Clifford has been trailing for the past 48 hours to the media in advance of the splash in the Mail on Sunday.
That build up was typically corrupt and untruthful.
In the over-hyped Yet the fact that the are is a living devastating condemnation of the assumed democratic system.
How dare someone like Prescott – and the dozens of others who have been exposed as being dishonest, corrupt and immoral in office, although not exhaustively - is the although to those who are not ‘card-carrying’ members of the UK Labour Party, the likes of Charles Clarke, Tony Blair and John Prescott do what they do with the consent of the members of the Labour Party.
They don’t.
It is a myth to say that there is any democratic mechanism in the Party which I have re-named the Blaired party,
The Labour Party of the past which had certain organisational structures for some debate and for at least partially holding party officials and representatives to account has been killed off by the combined corruption epitomised and personified by Tony Blair and Neil Kinnock and the rest of their petty, small-minded time-serving pocket-enhancing small-time ‘political leaders’ that have hijacked the Party and have now consolidated their hold all over Britain.
That Labour Party will not come to life again.
Not in the foreseeable future.
If there is any revival of the Labour Party, it will take a very serious social upheaval before the Blaired sort of Party is consigned to the dustbin and modestly democratic Party is created in its place.
As things ordinarily stand today, there is no likelihood of any social upheaval occurring in the immediate future in Britain.
And therefore there is no likelihood of any fundamental change away from the Blairing away of society.
This Blairing way of Britain will of course logically run into grounds at one point.
That point is as yet not visible.
Not as I write
But things may change
Events may occur that will defy all assumptions underlying all these observations.
Which also includes and affects the roles and the relevance of other so-called mainstream Parties.
And for the same reasons and by the extension of the same logical and ethical analysis I can mark the renaming the Liberal Democratic Party as the Lib Dims. Party
I was beaten to the post on that by Andrea Perry, who has been in my view one of the rarest of British political journalists!
A witty intelligent and humorous woman with a very identifiable moral stance about the role of holders of public office
So I updated Andrea’s file as it were and renamed the Liberal Democrats the Liberal Dumbs Party
I illustrate this by a recent sample of the Lib Dumbness of Simon Hughes who made an appearance on BBC Weekend News and answered parrot-like questions being put to him by presenter Michelle Hussain [Saturday 29 April 2006] One of the first things he did say was that his party was not known for calling for people to resign!
That is so morally inept!
And so typically Liberally Dumbish!
[To be continued]
previous editions
:
Coming on aadhikaronline in the next 48 hours [ordinary working day times] exclusive reports including these:
From the previous editions:
Due here at 2350 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
From the previous edition:
aadhikaronline reports and commentaries on Saturday 29 April 2006
Part 2
in the Hanbury Street on Sunday 22 January 2006
Was that motion significant?
The answer is Yes.
Was that historic
The answer is Yes.
Was that so significant that I can say it was so even though it was I who had spoken it?
Yes.
Why?
The answer is that because it was
For more than a hundred years before that, local people across what is now called the Borough of Tower Hamlets, had been labelled as being less able than their counterparts elsewhere in London to articulate their own demands.
What is worse, The East End of London had been consigned to a permanent slot in the dustbin of democratic assertiveness.
Everything that was done on or in the East End was usually said to be ‘done for the East End’ by others.
Eastenders ourselves were not capable of doing anything for us!
That was pretty much the norm.
And the norm included the record of the Polar Councillors, whose most famed member was of course George Lansbury’s. Those councillors went to jail to defend their community.
What a difference there is between the two incidents.
On 22 January 2006, the Brady centre Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole colluding Council meeting was on the moral high ground.
As against the Tower Hamlets Council who were assigned the lowest possible ground imaginable
[To be continued]
From the previous edition: Bank holiday Monday 1 May 2006 :
The damning evidence against Janet Ludlow’s Lib Dems Group on Tower Hamlets Council as obtained by the investigative members and supporters of KHOODEELAAR! the campaign against a Crossrail-hole Tower Hamlets Council. Khoodeelaar! is gearing up to confront any CrossRail-hole-bent Tower Hamlets Council that may result from any sepohological flukes on 5 May 2006! Here aadhikaronline starts the report on Why Janet Ludlow and the Liberal Democrats 'she has led' on Tower Hamlets Council do not deserve to be trusted at the 4 May 2006 council elections in Tower Hamlets- A special aadhikaronline report
[Part1]
By Muhammad Haque
1330 Hrs GMT / 1430 Hrs Uktime London Monday 1 May 2006
With the unravelling of the sleazy and undignified petty careers of Charles Clarke and John Prescott taking too long to be complete and over with, the ‘Nation’ in Britain is not keen really to welcome in its political arms the ‘alternative’ ‘leader’ Menzies Campbell.
He made a belated call for Clarke to go.
I had already derided his party’s spokesman Simon Hughes as politically inept for his little part in the Charles Clarke package as shown on Saturday by the BBC TV news.
Why then are the Lib Dems so dumb?
They are dumb because they are, more often than not, in the grips of very dumb people.
But that is not an evidential illogicality when it comes to dissecting the politically Dumb British Lib Democrats.
And the dumbness is nowhere more staggeringly unmistakably on display than in the awful mess that is called the Janet Ludlow ‘loadership’ of the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems.
They do not show initiative.
They do not come across as either coherent or consistent .
They most certainly do not come across as representing principles.
Janet Ludlow has been in the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems Group for more than a century.
That is how long it feels to long suffering observers of the spectacle of a dumbing-downwards loadership of a politically insignificant Liberal Democrats Group on Tower Hamlets Council.
br>And what has she to show for it?
Not much
Except a political adviser who is so bereft of awareness of life in the community that she sent to the Khoodeelaar! organisation a memo which must go down in history as a classic piece of evidence of how the Lib Dumbs became so dumb
So how come that the same Janet Ludlow has been appearing as a revived figure, as if she were an Egyptian Mummy who has been brought back to life to be included in a desperately dishonestly conjured up series of propaganda sheets!
Janet Ludlow is seen featuring in a party political election propaganda scheme as if she is actually involved in the Khoodeelaar!! campaign against CrossRail hole attack on the East End! Khoodeelaar! Is the most vibrant community-created campaign of the last One hundred years in the East End! I should know just how wrong and dishonest that audacious immoral act of petty party political opportunism and lying by Janet Ludlow’s LOADERSHIP is!
For three years I have done nothing else but to organise the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crassrail assault on the East End.>
For three years, I have wondered what the Lib Dems on Tower Hamlets Council were getting upto.
For three years, I have waited to hear a single one of them come forward and show in one breath, an awareness and an ability to acknowledge the existence of the Khoodeelaar! Movement and to identify with this campaign in courageous and constitutional opposition to the crass CrossRail hole attack plan against the East End that has been underway with the active collusion of the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
All the Khoodeelaar! campaign supporters have shared my amazement at the utter absence politically of the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems from the scene of the campaign against the CrossRail hole.
Until 22 January 2006!
[To be continued]
From the Previous edition:
J K Galbraith - why the BBC must apologise for that LSE-Desai outrage
MUHAMMAD HAQUE daily political commentary
0900 Hrs GMT London Monday 1 May 2006
The world has lost a great contributor to caring and civilised thought. J K Galbraith has passed away.
I will always remember him for the great service he performed by explaining to the world so clearly how the Military Industrial Complex operates.
But the BBC are not content to let the memories of one of the most active social thinkers remain untarnished.
they brought in one of the most embarrassing emblems of ethnicity-linked careerism, a man they described as ‘emeritus professor’, and addressed as ‘Lord Desai’.
He does not deserve the BBC’s promotion. Let alone complicity in the awful insult he heaped on the just-deceased thinker. Desai compared Galbraith with the British faker and convicted criminal Jeffrey Archer!
We the licence payers have something to say about the BBC’s choice of ‘work’ which they spend our money on that ‘work’, that interview with the ignoramus Desai, constituted neither work, nor service.
Is there no end to the idiocies at the heart of the BBC?
Or, to be precise, at the heart of the Radio Four Today programme?
The Radio Four Today programme broadcast an alleged interview with one of the UK’s most corrupt and ignorant ‘professors’, linked with the London School of Economics [LSE], who exhibited once again just how pathetically backward and sewer-like the world of Big Business academia is.
In the alleged interview, the LSE-linked ignoramus Professor Desai displayed his own total ignorance of the discipline of economics and what is more he showed just how deeply sunk in the mire of selfishness, greed and corruption he himself was.
He dismissed JK Galbraith as an economist and then sang the praise of Market capitalism, globalisation in the most shameless way possible. He then said that he never liked Galbraith, anyway!
The licence payers of the UK must demand to know why our licence paying money is being wasted and misused by the BBC giving airtime to such completely bad elements who spread the gospel of capitalist uncare, discare where there should be much more space and time given to the propagation of the truth about our world and how the truly liberating ideas of educators must be at the centre of our knowledge about events.
The ignoramus Desai is not any description of source for anything remotely to do with the truth. He is a fabricator and the BBC should know better than to allow a practised fabricator and surrogate to be given any platform where only the truth about capitalism will be acceptable. No room for lies. For to allow any lies about economics to be aired as if it has any backing of scholarship would be to violate the rights of so many millions whose very existence is threatened and denied by the oppressive gospel of market economics and capitalism.
Galbraith’s contributions included the fact that he brought out into the open some of the crucial evidence about how the corrupt market capitalism – and Globalisation in today’s terminology- operates. In the society that is dominated by the worlds vilest violators of human rights.
If nothing else, that achievement by Galbraith was much more significant than the stupid LSE Desai has any ability to recognise.
The question is: what agenda was the BBC Radio Four editor or programme commissioners operating under?
Did they have to bring in that ignorance spreader Desai?
Why did they have to broadcast that sickeningly ignorant string of lies by the LSE moron Desai?
Since when had that punter become a source of anything to do with civilised discourse? Let alone of anything to do with the truth about this world and how the gospel of free market economic lies has been sued to violate and massacre millions?
How dare the BBC let the LSE moron Desai utter stupidities about J K Galbraith?
What does Desai know about Economics?
Ed Stourton should now be renamed Ed Stupidone for his own stupidities in conducting that unforgivably ignorant interview giving undeserved airtime to this LSE-linked peddler of corruption and Big Business perversion of the wealth of nature and the wealth of societies.
A transcript of the BBC Radio Four idiotic interview with LSE moron Desai going on at the just-deceased economist and social condemnatory J K Galbraith will be published here shortly
This filed 0915 Hrs GMT
Monday 1` May 2006
From the previous edition :
AADHIKARonline PUBLISHING LAW note at 2120 Hrs GMT
Due to the Khoodeelaar! campaign taking legal action against the Tower Hamlets Liberal Democratic Group, the scheduled aadhikaronline feature about the Liberal Democratic councillor Louise Alexander and her blogs, has been postponed indefinitely.
That feature would have appeared here at 2350 Hrs GMT on Sunday 30 April 2006.
That publication will not now go ahead as the contents involved would include materials that are now being presented to the High Court in the action by Khoodeelaar! against Janet Ludlow and her Liberal Democratic Group on Tower Hamlets Council.
Aadhikaronline legal note: 2120 Hrs GMT
2220 Hrs UKtime
Sunday 30 April 2006
From the previous edition :< br>
The 3rd Edition AADHIKARonline London 1330 Hrs GMT / 1430 Hrs Sunday 30 April 2006
Why Janet Ludlow the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dem Group leader [opposition councillor] is being issued with court action notice by Khoodeelaar! this week and the relevance of the EVIDENCE from the past elections to Tower Hamlets Council – the worrying legacies of the Liberal Democrats 1990-1994 [Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs]
Full report here shortly [This filed 1330 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006]
From the previous, the 2nd
Edition :
Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs
How in Tower Hamlets, any consequence of an electoral fluke, resulting in Lib Dems getting any say on how the Council is run, will cause serious problems and lose the community vital support at a time when the East End needs a Council made up of honest people who are actually actively opposed to liars and lying in public office!
By Muhammad Haque
London 1100 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
Yet they could bring changes for the better.
If they had good people standing as candidates.
More importantly, if they had good people standing with good prospects of getting elected/
There are all across London good people about.
May be not as many of them who are willing to stand under those circumstances as there should be but there are enough of them that could really make a difference if they were among the people on elected councils in London after the 4 May scheduled polls.
But the present political parties, groupings and the consequent system of elections do not want good people. running local councils in London
Tony Blair does not want them
None of Blair’s ministers wants them
And the Odiously Parasitic Department's Minister John Prescott would not definitely want them
So, come 5 May 2006 in the euphoria and mad rush for photocells, celebrations and the odd neo-fascistic grabbing of the headlines, there will be a great deal to mourn in London.
The loss of an opportunity to stop at least some of the crooks and thieves robbing the people of our rights.
Those thieves may be smaller in size and in terms of the individual access they would have to the vaults of our freedoms than their counterparts to be found in the inflated egos of the ministers included in Blair’s current entourage
. But looting – ‘voting’ ‘in cabinet’ and ‘in committee’ together, those crooks posing and ‘conducting’ as elected councillors will represent a very serious threat to liberties and the properties of the people in the communities covered by their councils.
Just as the crooks in control of the Tower Hamlets Council did during the five years of the INVITING of the CrossRail hole threat to the East End of London, 2000-2005.
Does it mean that the removal of that clique of crooks on 4 May 2006 by the voters, would usher in a morally clean group of councillors?
It does not.
How?
Because we have already seen the evidence of their immorality, their ingratitude to the community even before the last week before the scheduled polling day has run out
Some of them are already changing their gaits, the demeanours and their ways of addressing people in the community
They are behaving as if they are due for something like a coronation and the only thing that remains to be done is for the final finishing touches to be applied to the thrones!
Their heads are bigger than even Brenda could make her’s look on an especially good day based on her 60 plus years of experience of carrying the ‘right’ to sit in a real thrown.
In the Brick Lane London E1 area where the political heat surrounding the 4 May 2006 elections was actually launched at the end of December 2005 by the Khoodeelaar! 2006 election Manifesto, every single ‘legit’ party and candidate has had a pad.
This has been either in the form of a particular eating house – a Brick Lane Curry house- or a café or a similar, business location.
So vital is the place of Brick Lane in the political locations list. Locations to be seen at
Even the Isle of Dogs-bent property takeoverwallhas , the Conservatives, have been able to sneak into Brick Lane and pretend to be ‘friends’ with elements that have feigned enough abilities to give out ethnicity-linked noise that they [these Conservatives] have convinced themselves that they are on the way to taking over the democratic centre of the East End borough of Tower Hamlets.
If not in their own elected rights then by an actively encouraged alliance with the sub-Conservatives who are now expectantly moving nearer to the centre of a collation with the Conservatives to control Tower Hamlets
The Ies of Dogs estate-agents-Conservatives have no problem in dismissing the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
They know that they can do this by openly
[To be continued]
From the previous edition published at 0April 2006>/April 2006>/ Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
The Muhammad Haque daily Political Commentary
Why I had described Prescott’s Odiously Parasitical Department …..
By Muhammad Haque
0750 Hrs GMT 0850 Hrs UK time Sunday 30 April 2006
My battle against john Prescott centred on two factors.
His moral bankruptcy and his incredible stupidity about what the Labour Party was about
Those would take another 25 years to be recognised by the Mail on Sunday and by everybody else.
Everybody else that is occupying a place or similar in the mass propaganda, media business.
But the Mail on Sunday has already messed up any remnants of a moral message arising from the Prescott adulterous irresponsibility.
Prescott, like the conniving corrupting Charles Clarke, Prescott’s cabinet colleague and fellow travelling time-server in public office, has always been a bogus member of ‘the movement’.
He is petty, small-minded and has always lacked the basic depth that he must have had if he warranted being taken seriously as a true and trusted champion of the people whose lives literally depended on the deeds and or more likely the misdeeds of people like Prescott occupying positions of public authority and ‘power’ in the country.
I had asked him to explain one of the hundreds of contradictions in the then Labour regime in the UK.
It was about fiddling the official statistics and I asked him to explain why the official statistics on joblessness were being fiddled>
I assumed that he would direct his officials to address the details, as I knew that he lacked the necessary abilities to do that himself but I did know that even he knew the meaning and the implications for ‘democracy’ of the unacceptability, even in the context of the 1970s Britain, of fiddling the figures.
Prescott’s reply was staggeringly stupid.
And it missed the point
As always Prescott misses the main picture
That is why, more than 20 years since my previous attempt at getting him to tell the straight facts about Government behaviour I came across the fact that he was back in office and that his office had been given the shorthand name of ODPM. I immediately described his Department’s acronym ODPM as the ODiously Parasitical Moron’s Department [and permutations to similar effects]
The shocking truth about the UK political system [!!!] is NOT that there is no moral authority from the people in the country for the likes of Prescott to be in public office.
Th shocking truth is that the likes of Prescott are ALLOWED to get into public office.
And that they are even revered! Whilst holding those offices
The ‘revelations’ only leak out by default
The political system in Britain is a thoroughly corrupt immoral system
It is an opportunistic, insensitive,, uncaring, unethical system that will only be replaced by anything remotely resembling an ethical, moral one when the inevitable critical convergence occurs between all the crooked couriers of careeristic missions and manifestos
Even in the Mail on Sunday today [Sunday 30 April 2006]
there are paragraphs and paragraphs of plugs for the ‘wonderful boss’ that John Prescott alleged was.
And this is being attributed to Mac Clifford’s latest prize cash-machine –Tracey Temple, whom Clifford has been trailing for the past 48 hours to the media in advance of the splash in the Mail on Sunday.
That build up was typically corrupt and untruthful.
In the over-hyped Yet the fact that the are is a living devastating condemnation of the assumed democratic system.
How dare someone like Prescott – and the dozens of others who have been exposed as being dishonest, corrupt and immoral in office, although not exhaustively - is the although to those who are not ‘card-carrying’ members of the UK Labour Party, the likes of Charles Clarke, Tony Blair and John Prescott do what they do with the consent of the members of the Labour Party.
They don’t.
It is a myth to say that there is any democratic mechanism in the Party which I have re-named the Blaired party,
The Labour Party of the past which had certain organisational structures for some debate and for at least partially holding party officials and representatives to account has been killed off by the combined corruption epitomised and personified by Tony Blair and Neil Kinnock and the rest of their petty, small-minded time-serving pocket-enhancing small-time ‘political leaders’ that have hijacked the Party and have now consolidated their hold all over Britain.
That Labour Party will not come to life again.
Not in the foreseeable future.
If there is any revival of the Labour Party, it will take a very serious social upheaval before the Blaired sort of Party is consigned to the dustbin and modestly democratic Party is created in its place.
As things ordinarily stand today, there is no likelihood of any social upheaval occurring in the immediate future in Britain.
And therefore there is no likelihood of any fundamental change away from the Blairing away of society.
This Blairing way of Britain will of course logically run into grounds at one point.
That point is as yet not visible.
Not as I write
But things may change
Events may occur that will defy all assumptions underlying all these observations.
Which also includes and affects the roles and the relevance of other so-called mainstream Parties.
And for the same reasons and by the extension of the same logical and ethical analysis I can mark the renaming the Liberal Democratic Party as the Lib Dims. Party
I was beaten to the post on that by Andrea Perry, who has been in my view one of the rarest of British political journalists!
A witty intelligent and humorous woman with a very identifiable moral stance about the role of holders of public office
So I updated Andrea’s file as it were and renamed the Liberal Democrats the Liberal Dumbs Party
I illustrate this by a recent sample of the Lib Dumbness of Simon Hughes who made an appearance on BBC Weekend News and answered parrot-like questions being put to him by presenter Michelle Hussain [Saturday 29 April 2006] One of the first things he did say was that his party was not known for calling for people to resign!
That is so morally inept!
And so typically Liberally Dumbish!
[To be continued]
previous editions
:
Coming on aadhikaronline in the next 48 hours [ordinary working day times] exclusive reports including these:
From the previous editions:
[Part1]
With the unravelling of the sleazy and undignified petty careers of Charles Clarke and John Prescott taking too long to be complete and over with, the ‘Nation’ in Britain is not keen really to welcome in its political arms the ‘alternative’ ‘leader’ Menzies Campbell.
He made a belated call for Clarke to go.
I had already derided his party’s spokesman Simon Hughes as politically inept for his little part in the Charles Clarke package as shown on Saturday by the BBC TV news.
Why then are the Lib Dems so dumb?
They are dumb because they are, more often than not, in the grips of very dumb people.
But that is not an evidential illogicality when it comes to dissecting the politically Dumb British Lib Democrats.
And the dumbness is nowhere more staggeringly unmistakably on display than in the awful mess that is called the Janet Ludlow ‘loadership’ of the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems.
They do not show initiative.
They do not come across as either coherent or consistent .
They most certainly do not come across as representing principles.
Janet Ludlow has been in the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems Group for more than a century.
That is how long it feels to long suffering observers of the spectacle of a dumbing-downwards loadership of a politically insignificant Liberal Democrats Group on Tower Hamlets Council.
br>And what has she to show for it?
Not much
Except a political adviser who is so bereft of awareness of life in the community that she sent to the Khoodeelaar! organisation a memo which must go down in history as a classic piece of evidence of how the Lib Dumbs became so dumb
So how come that the same Janet Ludlow has been appearing as a revived figure, as if she were an Egyptian Mummy who has been brought back to life to be included in a desperately dishonestly conjured up series of propaganda sheets!
Janet Ludlow is seen featuring in a party political election propaganda scheme as if she is actually involved in the Khoodeelaar!! campaign against CrossRail hole attack on the East End! Khoodeelaar! Is the most vibrant community-created campaign of the last One hundred years in the East End! I should know just how wrong and dishonest that audacious immoral act of petty party political opportunism and lying by Janet Ludlow’s LOADERSHIP is!
For three years I have done nothing else but to organise the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crassrail assault on the East End.>
For three years, I have wondered what the Lib Dems on Tower Hamlets Council were getting upto.
For three years, I have waited to hear a single one of them come forward and show in one breath, an awareness and an ability to acknowledge the existence of the Khoodeelaar! Movement and to identify with this campaign in courageous and constitutional opposition to the crass CrossRail hole attack plan against the East End that has been underway with the active collusion of the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
All the Khoodeelaar! campaign supporters have shared my amazement at the utter absence politically of the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems from the scene of the campaign against the CrossRail hole.
Until 22 January 2006!
[To be continued]
MUHAMMAD HAQUE daily political commentary
0900 Hrs GMT London Monday 1 May 2006
The world has lost a great contributor to caring and civilised thought. J K Galbraith has passed away.
I will always remember him for the great service he performed by explaining to the world so clearly how the Military Industrial Complex operates.
But the BBC are not content to let the memories of one of the most active social thinkers remain untarnished.
they brought in one of the most embarrassing emblems of ethnicity-linked careerism, a man they described as ‘emeritus professor’, and addressed as ‘Lord Desai’.
He does not deserve the BBC’s promotion. Let alone complicity in the awful insult he heaped on the just-deceased thinker. Desai compared Galbraith with the British faker and convicted criminal Jeffrey Archer!
We the licence payers have something to say about the BBC’s choice of ‘work’ which they spend our money on that ‘work’, that interview with the ignoramus Desai, constituted neither work, nor service.
Is there no end to the idiocies at the heart of the BBC?
Or, to be precise, at the heart of the Radio Four Today programme?
The Radio Four Today programme broadcast an alleged interview with one of the UK’s most corrupt and ignorant ‘professors’, linked with the London School of Economics [LSE], who exhibited once again just how pathetically backward and sewer-like the world of Big Business academia is.
In the alleged interview, the LSE-linked ignoramus Professor Desai displayed his own total ignorance of the discipline of economics and what is more he showed just how deeply sunk in the mire of selfishness, greed and corruption he himself was.
He dismissed JK Galbraith as an economist and then sang the praise of Market capitalism, globalisation in the most shameless way possible. He then said that he never liked Galbraith, anyway!
The licence payers of the UK must demand to know why our licence paying money is being wasted and misused by the BBC giving airtime to such completely bad elements who spread the gospel of capitalist uncare, discare where there should be much more space and time given to the propagation of the truth about our world and how the truly liberating ideas of educators must be at the centre of our knowledge about events.
The ignoramus Desai is not any description of source for anything remotely to do with the truth. He is a fabricator and the BBC should know better than to allow a practised fabricator and surrogate to be given any platform where only the truth about capitalism will be acceptable. No room for lies. For to allow any lies about economics to be aired as if it has any backing of scholarship would be to violate the rights of so many millions whose very existence is threatened and denied by the oppressive gospel of market economics and capitalism.
Galbraith’s contributions included the fact that he brought out into the open some of the crucial evidence about how the corrupt market capitalism – and Globalisation in today’s terminology- operates. In the society that is dominated by the worlds vilest violators of human rights.
If nothing else, that achievement by Galbraith was much more significant than the stupid LSE Desai has any ability to recognise.
The question is: what agenda was the BBC Radio Four editor or programme commissioners operating under?
Did they have to bring in that ignorance spreader Desai?
Why did they have to broadcast that sickeningly ignorant string of lies by the LSE moron Desai?
Since when had that punter become a source of anything to do with civilised discourse? Let alone of anything to do with the truth about this world and how the gospel of free market economic lies has been sued to violate and massacre millions?
How dare the BBC let the LSE moron Desai utter stupidities about J K Galbraith?
What does Desai know about Economics?
Ed Stourton should now be renamed Ed Stupidone for his own stupidities in conducting that unforgivably ignorant interview giving undeserved airtime to this LSE-linked peddler of corruption and Big Business perversion of the wealth of nature and the wealth of societies.
A transcript of the BBC Radio Four idiotic interview with LSE moron Desai going on at the just-deceased economist and social condemnatory J K Galbraith will be published here shortly
This filed 0915 Hrs GMT
Monday 1` May 2006
From the previous edition :
AADHIKARonline PUBLISHING LAW note at 2120 Hrs GMT
Due to the Khoodeelaar! campaign taking legal action against the Tower Hamlets Liberal Democratic Group, the scheduled aadhikaronline feature about the Liberal Democratic councillor Louise Alexander and her blogs, has been postponed indefinitely.
That feature would have appeared here at 2350 Hrs GMT on Sunday 30 April 2006.
That publication will not now go ahead as the contents involved would include materials that are now being presented to the High Court in the action by Khoodeelaar! against Janet Ludlow and her Liberal Democratic Group on Tower Hamlets Council.
Aadhikaronline legal note: 2120 Hrs GMT
2220 Hrs UKtime
Sunday 30 April 2006
From the previous edition :< br>
The 3rd Edition AADHIKARonline London 1330 Hrs GMT / 1430 Hrs Sunday 30 April 2006
Why Janet Ludlow the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dem Group leader [opposition councillor] is being issued with court action notice by Khoodeelaar! this week and the relevance of the EVIDENCE from the past elections to Tower Hamlets Council – the worrying legacies of the Liberal Democrats 1990-1994 [Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs]
Full report here shortly [This filed 1330 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006]
From the previous, the 2nd
Edition :
Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs
How in Tower Hamlets, any consequence of an electoral fluke, resulting in Lib Dems getting any say on how the Council is run, will cause serious problems and lose the community vital support at a time when the East End needs a Council made up of honest people who are actually actively opposed to liars and lying in public office!
By Muhammad Haque
London 1100 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
Yet they could bring changes for the better.
If they had good people standing as candidates.
More importantly, if they had good people standing with good prospects of getting elected/
There are all across London good people about.
May be not as many of them who are willing to stand under those circumstances as there should be but there are enough of them that could really make a difference if they were among the people on elected councils in London after the 4 May scheduled polls.
But the present political parties, groupings and the consequent system of elections do not want good people. running local councils in London
Tony Blair does not want them
None of Blair’s ministers wants them
And the Odiously Parasitic Department's Minister John Prescott would not definitely want them
So, come 5 May 2006 in the euphoria and mad rush for photocells, celebrations and the odd neo-fascistic grabbing of the headlines, there will be a great deal to mourn in London.
The loss of an opportunity to stop at least some of the crooks and thieves robbing the people of our rights.
Those thieves may be smaller in size and in terms of the individual access they would have to the vaults of our freedoms than their counterparts to be found in the inflated egos of the ministers included in Blair’s current entourage
. But looting – ‘voting’ ‘in cabinet’ and ‘in committee’ together, those crooks posing and ‘conducting’ as elected councillors will represent a very serious threat to liberties and the properties of the people in the communities covered by their councils.
Just as the crooks in control of the Tower Hamlets Council did during the five years of the INVITING of the CrossRail hole threat to the East End of London, 2000-2005.
Does it mean that the removal of that clique of crooks on 4 May 2006 by the voters, would usher in a morally clean group of councillors?
It does not.
How?
Because we have already seen the evidence of their immorality, their ingratitude to the community even before the last week before the scheduled polling day has run out
Some of them are already changing their gaits, the demeanours and their ways of addressing people in the community
They are behaving as if they are due for something like a coronation and the only thing that remains to be done is for the final finishing touches to be applied to the thrones!
Their heads are bigger than even Brenda could make her’s look on an especially good day based on her 60 plus years of experience of carrying the ‘right’ to sit in a real thrown.
In the Brick Lane London E1 area where the political heat surrounding the 4 May 2006 elections was actually launched at the end of December 2005 by the Khoodeelaar! 2006 election Manifesto, every single ‘legit’ party and candidate has had a pad.
This has been either in the form of a particular eating house – a Brick Lane Curry house- or a café or a similar, business location.
So vital is the place of Brick Lane in the political locations list. Locations to be seen at
Even the Isle of Dogs-bent property takeoverwallhas , the Conservatives, have been able to sneak into Brick Lane and pretend to be ‘friends’ with elements that have feigned enough abilities to give out ethnicity-linked noise that they [these Conservatives] have convinced themselves that they are on the way to taking over the democratic centre of the East End borough of Tower Hamlets.
If not in their own elected rights then by an actively encouraged alliance with the sub-Conservatives who are now expectantly moving nearer to the centre of a collation with the Conservatives to control Tower Hamlets
The Ies of Dogs estate-agents-Conservatives have no problem in dismissing the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
They know that they can do this by openly
[To be continued]
From the previous edition published at 0April 2006>/April 2006>/ Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
The Muhammad Haque daily Political Commentary
Why I had described Prescott’s Odiously Parasitical Department …..
By Muhammad Haque
0750 Hrs GMT 0850 Hrs UK time Sunday 30 April 2006
My battle against john Prescott centred on two factors.
His moral bankruptcy and his incredible stupidity about what the Labour Party was about
Those would take another 25 years to be recognised by the Mail on Sunday and by everybody else.
Everybody else that is occupying a place or similar in the mass propaganda, media business.
But the Mail on Sunday has already messed up any remnants of a moral message arising from the Prescott adulterous irresponsibility.
Prescott, like the conniving corrupting Charles Clarke, Prescott’s cabinet colleague and fellow travelling time-server in public office, has always been a bogus member of ‘the movement’.
He is petty, small-minded and has always lacked the basic depth that he must have had if he warranted being taken seriously as a true and trusted champion of the people whose lives literally depended on the deeds and or more likely the misdeeds of people like Prescott occupying positions of public authority and ‘power’ in the country.
I had asked him to explain one of the hundreds of contradictions in the then Labour regime in the UK.
It was about fiddling the official statistics and I asked him to explain why the official statistics on joblessness were being fiddled>
I assumed that he would direct his officials to address the details, as I knew that he lacked the necessary abilities to do that himself but I did know that even he knew the meaning and the implications for ‘democracy’ of the unacceptability, even in the context of the 1970s Britain, of fiddling the figures.
Prescott’s reply was staggeringly stupid.
And it missed the point
As always Prescott misses the main picture
That is why, more than 20 years since my previous attempt at getting him to tell the straight facts about Government behaviour I came across the fact that he was back in office and that his office had been given the shorthand name of ODPM. I immediately described his Department’s acronym ODPM as the ODiously Parasitical Moron’s Department [and permutations to similar effects]
The shocking truth about the UK political system [!!!] is NOT that there is no moral authority from the people in the country for the likes of Prescott to be in public office.
Th shocking truth is that the likes of Prescott are ALLOWED to get into public office.
And that they are even revered! Whilst holding those offices
The ‘revelations’ only leak out by default
The political system in Britain is a thoroughly corrupt immoral system
It is an opportunistic, insensitive,, uncaring, unethical system that will only be replaced by anything remotely resembling an ethical, moral one when the inevitable critical convergence occurs between all the crooked couriers of careeristic missions and manifestos
Even in the Mail on Sunday today [Sunday 30 April 2006]
there are paragraphs and paragraphs of plugs for the ‘wonderful boss’ that John Prescott alleged was.
And this is being attributed to Mac Clifford’s latest prize cash-machine –Tracey Temple, whom Clifford has been trailing for the past 48 hours to the media in advance of the splash in the Mail on Sunday.
That build up was typically corrupt and untruthful.
In the over-hyped Yet the fact that the are is a living devastating condemnation of the assumed democratic system.
How dare someone like Prescott – and the dozens of others who have been exposed as being dishonest, corrupt and immoral in office, although not exhaustively - is the although to those who are not ‘card-carrying’ members of the UK Labour Party, the likes of Charles Clarke, Tony Blair and John Prescott do what they do with the consent of the members of the Labour Party.
They don’t.
It is a myth to say that there is any democratic mechanism in the Party which I have re-named the Blaired party,
The Labour Party of the past which had certain organisational structures for some debate and for at least partially holding party officials and representatives to account has been killed off by the combined corruption epitomised and personified by Tony Blair and Neil Kinnock and the rest of their petty, small-minded time-serving pocket-enhancing small-time ‘political leaders’ that have hijacked the Party and have now consolidated their hold all over Britain.
That Labour Party will not come to life again.
Not in the foreseeable future.
If there is any revival of the Labour Party, it will take a very serious social upheaval before the Blaired sort of Party is consigned to the dustbin and modestly democratic Party is created in its place.
As things ordinarily stand today, there is no likelihood of any social upheaval occurring in the immediate future in Britain.
And therefore there is no likelihood of any fundamental change away from the Blairing away of society.
This Blairing way of Britain will of course logically run into grounds at one point.
That point is as yet not visible.
Not as I write
But things may change
Events may occur that will defy all assumptions underlying all these observations.
Which also includes and affects the roles and the relevance of other so-called mainstream Parties.
And for the same reasons and by the extension of the same logical and ethical analysis I can mark the renaming the Liberal Democratic Party as the Lib Dims. Party
I was beaten to the post on that by Andrea Perry, who has been in my view one of the rarest of British political journalists!
A witty intelligent and humorous woman with a very identifiable moral stance about the role of holders of public office
So I updated Andrea’s file as it were and renamed the Liberal Democrats the Liberal Dumbs Party
I illustrate this by a recent sample of the Lib Dumbness of Simon Hughes who made an appearance on BBC Weekend News and answered parrot-like questions being put to him by presenter Michelle Hussain [Saturday 29 April 2006] One of the first things he did say was that his party was not known for calling for people to resign!
That is so morally inept!
And so typically Liberally Dumbish!
[To be continued]
previous editions
:
Coming on aadhikaronline in the next 48 hours [ordinary working day times] exclusive reports including these:
From the previous editions:
I will always remember him for the great service he performed by explaining to the world so clearly how the Military Industrial Complex operates.
But the BBC are not content to let the memories of one of the most active social thinkers remain untarnished.
they brought in one of the most embarrassing emblems of ethnicity-linked careerism, a man they described as ‘emeritus professor’, and addressed as ‘Lord Desai’.
He does not deserve the BBC’s promotion. Let alone complicity in the awful insult he heaped on the just-deceased thinker. Desai compared Galbraith with the British faker and convicted criminal Jeffrey Archer!
We the licence payers have something to say about the BBC’s choice of ‘work’ which they spend our money on that ‘work’, that interview with the ignoramus Desai, constituted neither work, nor service.
Is there no end to the idiocies at the heart of the BBC?
Or, to be precise, at the heart of the Radio Four Today programme?
The Radio Four Today programme broadcast an alleged interview with one of the UK’s most corrupt and ignorant ‘professors’, linked with the London School of Economics [LSE], who exhibited once again just how pathetically backward and sewer-like the world of Big Business academia is.
In the alleged interview, the LSE-linked ignoramus Professor Desai displayed his own total ignorance of the discipline of economics and what is more he showed just how deeply sunk in the mire of selfishness, greed and corruption he himself was.
He dismissed JK Galbraith as an economist and then sang the praise of Market capitalism, globalisation in the most shameless way possible. He then said that he never liked Galbraith, anyway!
The licence payers of the UK must demand to know why our licence paying money is being wasted and misused by the BBC giving airtime to such completely bad elements who spread the gospel of capitalist uncare, discare where there should be much more space and time given to the propagation of the truth about our world and how the truly liberating ideas of educators must be at the centre of our knowledge about events.
The ignoramus Desai is not any description of source for anything remotely to do with the truth. He is a fabricator and the BBC should know better than to allow a practised fabricator and surrogate to be given any platform where only the truth about capitalism will be acceptable. No room for lies. For to allow any lies about economics to be aired as if it has any backing of scholarship would be to violate the rights of so many millions whose very existence is threatened and denied by the oppressive gospel of market economics and capitalism.
Galbraith’s contributions included the fact that he brought out into the open some of the crucial evidence about how the corrupt market capitalism – and Globalisation in today’s terminology- operates. In the society that is dominated by the worlds vilest violators of human rights.
If nothing else, that achievement by Galbraith was much more significant than the stupid LSE Desai has any ability to recognise.
The question is: what agenda was the BBC Radio Four editor or programme commissioners operating under?
Did they have to bring in that ignorance spreader Desai?
Why did they have to broadcast that sickeningly ignorant string of lies by the LSE moron Desai?
Since when had that punter become a source of anything to do with civilised discourse? Let alone of anything to do with the truth about this world and how the gospel of free market economic lies has been sued to violate and massacre millions?
How dare the BBC let the LSE moron Desai utter stupidities about J K Galbraith?
What does Desai know about Economics?
Ed Stourton should now be renamed Ed Stupidone for his own stupidities in conducting that unforgivably ignorant interview giving undeserved airtime to this LSE-linked peddler of corruption and Big Business perversion of the wealth of nature and the wealth of societies.
A transcript of the BBC Radio Four idiotic interview with LSE moron Desai going on at the just-deceased economist and social condemnatory J K Galbraith will be published here shortly
This filed 0915 Hrs GMT
Monday 1` May 2006
From the previous edition :
AADHIKARonline PUBLISHING LAW note at 2120 Hrs GMT
Due to the Khoodeelaar! campaign taking legal action against the Tower Hamlets Liberal Democratic Group, the scheduled aadhikaronline feature about the Liberal Democratic councillor Louise Alexander and her blogs, has been postponed indefinitely.
That feature would have appeared here at 2350 Hrs GMT on Sunday 30 April 2006.
That publication will not now go ahead as the contents involved would include materials that are now being presented to the High Court in the action by Khoodeelaar! against Janet Ludlow and her Liberal Democratic Group on Tower Hamlets Council.
Aadhikaronline legal note: 2120 Hrs GMT
2220 Hrs UKtime
Sunday 30 April 2006
From the previous edition :< br>
The 3rd Edition AADHIKARonline London 1330 Hrs GMT / 1430 Hrs Sunday 30 April 2006
Why Janet Ludlow the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dem Group leader [opposition councillor] is being issued with court action notice by Khoodeelaar! this week and the relevance of the EVIDENCE from the past elections to Tower Hamlets Council – the worrying legacies of the Liberal Democrats 1990-1994 [Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs]
Full report here shortly [This filed 1330 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006]
From the previous, the 2nd
Edition :
Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs
How in Tower Hamlets, any consequence of an electoral fluke, resulting in Lib Dems getting any say on how the Council is run, will cause serious problems and lose the community vital support at a time when the East End needs a Council made up of honest people who are actually actively opposed to liars and lying in public office!
By Muhammad Haque
London 1100 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
Yet they could bring changes for the better.
If they had good people standing as candidates.
More importantly, if they had good people standing with good prospects of getting elected/
There are all across London good people about.
May be not as many of them who are willing to stand under those circumstances as there should be but there are enough of them that could really make a difference if they were among the people on elected councils in London after the 4 May scheduled polls.
But the present political parties, groupings and the consequent system of elections do not want good people. running local councils in London
Tony Blair does not want them
None of Blair’s ministers wants them
And the Odiously Parasitic Department's Minister John Prescott would not definitely want them
So, come 5 May 2006 in the euphoria and mad rush for photocells, celebrations and the odd neo-fascistic grabbing of the headlines, there will be a great deal to mourn in London.
The loss of an opportunity to stop at least some of the crooks and thieves robbing the people of our rights.
Those thieves may be smaller in size and in terms of the individual access they would have to the vaults of our freedoms than their counterparts to be found in the inflated egos of the ministers included in Blair’s current entourage
. But looting – ‘voting’ ‘in cabinet’ and ‘in committee’ together, those crooks posing and ‘conducting’ as elected councillors will represent a very serious threat to liberties and the properties of the people in the communities covered by their councils.
Just as the crooks in control of the Tower Hamlets Council did during the five years of the INVITING of the CrossRail hole threat to the East End of London, 2000-2005.
Does it mean that the removal of that clique of crooks on 4 May 2006 by the voters, would usher in a morally clean group of councillors?
It does not.
How?
Because we have already seen the evidence of their immorality, their ingratitude to the community even before the last week before the scheduled polling day has run out
Some of them are already changing their gaits, the demeanours and their ways of addressing people in the community
They are behaving as if they are due for something like a coronation and the only thing that remains to be done is for the final finishing touches to be applied to the thrones!
Their heads are bigger than even Brenda could make her’s look on an especially good day based on her 60 plus years of experience of carrying the ‘right’ to sit in a real thrown.
In the Brick Lane London E1 area where the political heat surrounding the 4 May 2006 elections was actually launched at the end of December 2005 by the Khoodeelaar! 2006 election Manifesto, every single ‘legit’ party and candidate has had a pad.
This has been either in the form of a particular eating house – a Brick Lane Curry house- or a café or a similar, business location.
So vital is the place of Brick Lane in the political locations list. Locations to be seen at
Even the Isle of Dogs-bent property takeoverwallhas , the Conservatives, have been able to sneak into Brick Lane and pretend to be ‘friends’ with elements that have feigned enough abilities to give out ethnicity-linked noise that they [these Conservatives] have convinced themselves that they are on the way to taking over the democratic centre of the East End borough of Tower Hamlets.
If not in their own elected rights then by an actively encouraged alliance with the sub-Conservatives who are now expectantly moving nearer to the centre of a collation with the Conservatives to control Tower Hamlets
The Ies of Dogs estate-agents-Conservatives have no problem in dismissing the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
They know that they can do this by openly
[To be continued]
From the previous edition published at 0April 2006>/April 2006>/ Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
The Muhammad Haque daily Political Commentary
Why I had described Prescott’s Odiously Parasitical Department …..
By Muhammad Haque
0750 Hrs GMT 0850 Hrs UK time Sunday 30 April 2006
My battle against john Prescott centred on two factors.
His moral bankruptcy and his incredible stupidity about what the Labour Party was about
Those would take another 25 years to be recognised by the Mail on Sunday and by everybody else.
Everybody else that is occupying a place or similar in the mass propaganda, media business.
But the Mail on Sunday has already messed up any remnants of a moral message arising from the Prescott adulterous irresponsibility.
Prescott, like the conniving corrupting Charles Clarke, Prescott’s cabinet colleague and fellow travelling time-server in public office, has always been a bogus member of ‘the movement’.
He is petty, small-minded and has always lacked the basic depth that he must have had if he warranted being taken seriously as a true and trusted champion of the people whose lives literally depended on the deeds and or more likely the misdeeds of people like Prescott occupying positions of public authority and ‘power’ in the country.
I had asked him to explain one of the hundreds of contradictions in the then Labour regime in the UK.
It was about fiddling the official statistics and I asked him to explain why the official statistics on joblessness were being fiddled>
I assumed that he would direct his officials to address the details, as I knew that he lacked the necessary abilities to do that himself but I did know that even he knew the meaning and the implications for ‘democracy’ of the unacceptability, even in the context of the 1970s Britain, of fiddling the figures.
Prescott’s reply was staggeringly stupid.
And it missed the point
As always Prescott misses the main picture
That is why, more than 20 years since my previous attempt at getting him to tell the straight facts about Government behaviour I came across the fact that he was back in office and that his office had been given the shorthand name of ODPM. I immediately described his Department’s acronym ODPM as the ODiously Parasitical Moron’s Department [and permutations to similar effects]
The shocking truth about the UK political system [!!!] is NOT that there is no moral authority from the people in the country for the likes of Prescott to be in public office.
Th shocking truth is that the likes of Prescott are ALLOWED to get into public office.
And that they are even revered! Whilst holding those offices
The ‘revelations’ only leak out by default
The political system in Britain is a thoroughly corrupt immoral system
It is an opportunistic, insensitive,, uncaring, unethical system that will only be replaced by anything remotely resembling an ethical, moral one when the inevitable critical convergence occurs between all the crooked couriers of careeristic missions and manifestos
Even in the Mail on Sunday today [Sunday 30 April 2006]
there are paragraphs and paragraphs of plugs for the ‘wonderful boss’ that John Prescott alleged was.
And this is being attributed to Mac Clifford’s latest prize cash-machine –Tracey Temple, whom Clifford has been trailing for the past 48 hours to the media in advance of the splash in the Mail on Sunday.
That build up was typically corrupt and untruthful.
In the over-hyped Yet the fact that the are is a living devastating condemnation of the assumed democratic system.
How dare someone like Prescott – and the dozens of others who have been exposed as being dishonest, corrupt and immoral in office, although not exhaustively - is the although to those who are not ‘card-carrying’ members of the UK Labour Party, the likes of Charles Clarke, Tony Blair and John Prescott do what they do with the consent of the members of the Labour Party.
They don’t.
It is a myth to say that there is any democratic mechanism in the Party which I have re-named the Blaired party,
The Labour Party of the past which had certain organisational structures for some debate and for at least partially holding party officials and representatives to account has been killed off by the combined corruption epitomised and personified by Tony Blair and Neil Kinnock and the rest of their petty, small-minded time-serving pocket-enhancing small-time ‘political leaders’ that have hijacked the Party and have now consolidated their hold all over Britain.
That Labour Party will not come to life again.
Not in the foreseeable future.
If there is any revival of the Labour Party, it will take a very serious social upheaval before the Blaired sort of Party is consigned to the dustbin and modestly democratic Party is created in its place.
As things ordinarily stand today, there is no likelihood of any social upheaval occurring in the immediate future in Britain.
And therefore there is no likelihood of any fundamental change away from the Blairing away of society.
This Blairing way of Britain will of course logically run into grounds at one point.
That point is as yet not visible.
Not as I write
But things may change
Events may occur that will defy all assumptions underlying all these observations.
Which also includes and affects the roles and the relevance of other so-called mainstream Parties.
And for the same reasons and by the extension of the same logical and ethical analysis I can mark the renaming the Liberal Democratic Party as the Lib Dims. Party
I was beaten to the post on that by Andrea Perry, who has been in my view one of the rarest of British political journalists!
A witty intelligent and humorous woman with a very identifiable moral stance about the role of holders of public office
So I updated Andrea’s file as it were and renamed the Liberal Democrats the Liberal Dumbs Party
I illustrate this by a recent sample of the Lib Dumbness of Simon Hughes who made an appearance on BBC Weekend News and answered parrot-like questions being put to him by presenter Michelle Hussain [Saturday 29 April 2006] One of the first things he did say was that his party was not known for calling for people to resign!
That is so morally inept!
And so typically Liberally Dumbish!
[To be continued]
previous editions
:
Coming on aadhikaronline in the next 48 hours [ordinary working day times] exclusive reports including these:
From the previous editions:
Due to the Khoodeelaar! campaign taking legal action against the Tower Hamlets Liberal Democratic Group, the scheduled aadhikaronline feature about the Liberal Democratic councillor Louise Alexander and her blogs, has been postponed indefinitely.
That feature would have appeared here at 2350 Hrs GMT on Sunday 30 April 2006.
That publication will not now go ahead as the contents involved would include materials that are now being presented to the High Court in the action by Khoodeelaar! against Janet Ludlow and her Liberal Democratic Group on Tower Hamlets Council.
Aadhikaronline legal note: 2120 Hrs GMT
2220 Hrs UKtime
Sunday 30 April 2006
From the previous edition :< br>
The 3rd Edition AADHIKARonline London 1330 Hrs GMT / 1430 Hrs Sunday 30 April 2006
Why Janet Ludlow the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council Lib Dem Group leader [opposition councillor] is being issued with court action notice by Khoodeelaar! this week and the relevance of the EVIDENCE from the past elections to Tower Hamlets Council – the worrying legacies of the Liberal Democrats 1990-1994 [Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs]
Full report here shortly [This filed 1330 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006]
From the previous, the 2nd
Edition :
Imminent, suspected, ‘change’ of ‘colour’ of political composition on inner London Councils will NOT bring about change for the better for the people! In these boroughs
How in Tower Hamlets, any consequence of an electoral fluke, resulting in Lib Dems getting any say on how the Council is run, will cause serious problems and lose the community vital support at a time when the East End needs a Council made up of honest people who are actually actively opposed to liars and lying in public office!
By Muhammad HaqueLondon 1100 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
Yet they could bring changes for the better.
If they had good people standing as candidates.
More importantly, if they had good people standing with good prospects of getting elected/
There are all across London good people about.
May be not as many of them who are willing to stand under those circumstances as there should be but there are enough of them that could really make a difference if they were among the people on elected councils in London after the 4 May scheduled polls.
But the present political parties, groupings and the consequent system of elections do not want good people. running local councils in London
Tony Blair does not want them
None of Blair’s ministers wants them
And the Odiously Parasitic Department's Minister John Prescott would not definitely want them
So, come 5 May 2006 in the euphoria and mad rush for photocells, celebrations and the odd neo-fascistic grabbing of the headlines, there will be a great deal to mourn in London.
The loss of an opportunity to stop at least some of the crooks and thieves robbing the people of our rights.
Those thieves may be smaller in size and in terms of the individual access they would have to the vaults of our freedoms than their counterparts to be found in the inflated egos of the ministers included in Blair’s current entourage
. But looting – ‘voting’ ‘in cabinet’ and ‘in committee’ together, those crooks posing and ‘conducting’ as elected councillors will represent a very serious threat to liberties and the properties of the people in the communities covered by their councils.
Just as the crooks in control of the Tower Hamlets Council did during the five years of the INVITING of the CrossRail hole threat to the East End of London, 2000-2005.
Does it mean that the removal of that clique of crooks on 4 May 2006 by the voters, would usher in a morally clean group of councillors?
It does not.
How?
Because we have already seen the evidence of their immorality, their ingratitude to the community even before the last week before the scheduled polling day has run out
Some of them are already changing their gaits, the demeanours and their ways of addressing people in the community
They are behaving as if they are due for something like a coronation and the only thing that remains to be done is for the final finishing touches to be applied to the thrones!
Their heads are bigger than even Brenda could make her’s look on an especially good day based on her 60 plus years of experience of carrying the ‘right’ to sit in a real thrown.
In the Brick Lane London E1 area where the political heat surrounding the 4 May 2006 elections was actually launched at the end of December 2005 by the Khoodeelaar! 2006 election Manifesto, every single ‘legit’ party and candidate has had a pad.
This has been either in the form of a particular eating house – a Brick Lane Curry house- or a café or a similar, business location.
So vital is the place of Brick Lane in the political locations list. Locations to be seen at
Even the Isle of Dogs-bent property takeoverwallhas , the Conservatives, have been able to sneak into Brick Lane and pretend to be ‘friends’ with elements that have feigned enough abilities to give out ethnicity-linked noise that they [these Conservatives] have convinced themselves that they are on the way to taking over the democratic centre of the East End borough of Tower Hamlets.
If not in their own elected rights then by an actively encouraged alliance with the sub-Conservatives who are now expectantly moving nearer to the centre of a collation with the Conservatives to control Tower Hamlets
The Ies of Dogs estate-agents-Conservatives have no problem in dismissing the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
They know that they can do this by openly
[To be continued]
From the previous edition published at 0April 2006>/April 2006>/ Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
The Muhammad Haque daily Political Commentary
Why I had described Prescott’s Odiously Parasitical Department …..
By Muhammad Haque
0750 Hrs GMT 0850 Hrs UK time Sunday 30 April 2006
My battle against john Prescott centred on two factors.
His moral bankruptcy and his incredible stupidity about what the Labour Party was about
Those would take another 25 years to be recognised by the Mail on Sunday and by everybody else.
Everybody else that is occupying a place or similar in the mass propaganda, media business.
But the Mail on Sunday has already messed up any remnants of a moral message arising from the Prescott adulterous irresponsibility.
Prescott, like the conniving corrupting Charles Clarke, Prescott’s cabinet colleague and fellow travelling time-server in public office, has always been a bogus member of ‘the movement’.
He is petty, small-minded and has always lacked the basic depth that he must have had if he warranted being taken seriously as a true and trusted champion of the people whose lives literally depended on the deeds and or more likely the misdeeds of people like Prescott occupying positions of public authority and ‘power’ in the country.
I had asked him to explain one of the hundreds of contradictions in the then Labour regime in the UK.
It was about fiddling the official statistics and I asked him to explain why the official statistics on joblessness were being fiddled>
I assumed that he would direct his officials to address the details, as I knew that he lacked the necessary abilities to do that himself but I did know that even he knew the meaning and the implications for ‘democracy’ of the unacceptability, even in the context of the 1970s Britain, of fiddling the figures.
Prescott’s reply was staggeringly stupid.
And it missed the point
As always Prescott misses the main picture
That is why, more than 20 years since my previous attempt at getting him to tell the straight facts about Government behaviour I came across the fact that he was back in office and that his office had been given the shorthand name of ODPM. I immediately described his Department’s acronym ODPM as the ODiously Parasitical Moron’s Department [and permutations to similar effects]
The shocking truth about the UK political system [!!!] is NOT that there is no moral authority from the people in the country for the likes of Prescott to be in public office.
Th shocking truth is that the likes of Prescott are ALLOWED to get into public office.
And that they are even revered! Whilst holding those offices
The ‘revelations’ only leak out by default
The political system in Britain is a thoroughly corrupt immoral system
It is an opportunistic, insensitive,, uncaring, unethical system that will only be replaced by anything remotely resembling an ethical, moral one when the inevitable critical convergence occurs between all the crooked couriers of careeristic missions and manifestos
Even in the Mail on Sunday today [Sunday 30 April 2006]
there are paragraphs and paragraphs of plugs for the ‘wonderful boss’ that John Prescott alleged was.
And this is being attributed to Mac Clifford’s latest prize cash-machine –Tracey Temple, whom Clifford has been trailing for the past 48 hours to the media in advance of the splash in the Mail on Sunday.
That build up was typically corrupt and untruthful.
In the over-hyped Yet the fact that the are is a living devastating condemnation of the assumed democratic system.
How dare someone like Prescott – and the dozens of others who have been exposed as being dishonest, corrupt and immoral in office, although not exhaustively - is the although to those who are not ‘card-carrying’ members of the UK Labour Party, the likes of Charles Clarke, Tony Blair and John Prescott do what they do with the consent of the members of the Labour Party.
They don’t.
It is a myth to say that there is any democratic mechanism in the Party which I have re-named the Blaired party,
The Labour Party of the past which had certain organisational structures for some debate and for at least partially holding party officials and representatives to account has been killed off by the combined corruption epitomised and personified by Tony Blair and Neil Kinnock and the rest of their petty, small-minded time-serving pocket-enhancing small-time ‘political leaders’ that have hijacked the Party and have now consolidated their hold all over Britain.
That Labour Party will not come to life again.
Not in the foreseeable future.
If there is any revival of the Labour Party, it will take a very serious social upheaval before the Blaired sort of Party is consigned to the dustbin and modestly democratic Party is created in its place.
As things ordinarily stand today, there is no likelihood of any social upheaval occurring in the immediate future in Britain.
And therefore there is no likelihood of any fundamental change away from the Blairing away of society.
This Blairing way of Britain will of course logically run into grounds at one point.
That point is as yet not visible.
Not as I write
But things may change
Events may occur that will defy all assumptions underlying all these observations.
Which also includes and affects the roles and the relevance of other so-called mainstream Parties.
And for the same reasons and by the extension of the same logical and ethical analysis I can mark the renaming the Liberal Democratic Party as the Lib Dims. Party
I was beaten to the post on that by Andrea Perry, who has been in my view one of the rarest of British political journalists!
A witty intelligent and humorous woman with a very identifiable moral stance about the role of holders of public office
So I updated Andrea’s file as it were and renamed the Liberal Democrats the Liberal Dumbs Party
I illustrate this by a recent sample of the Lib Dumbness of Simon Hughes who made an appearance on BBC Weekend News and answered parrot-like questions being put to him by presenter Michelle Hussain [Saturday 29 April 2006] One of the first things he did say was that his party was not known for calling for people to resign!
That is so morally inept!
And so typically Liberally Dumbish!
[To be continued]
previous editions
:
Coming on aadhikaronline in the next 48 hours [ordinary working day times] exclusive reports including these:
From the previous editions:
0750 Hrs GMT 0850 Hrs UK time Sunday 30 April 2006
My battle against john Prescott centred on two factors.
His moral bankruptcy and his incredible stupidity about what the Labour Party was about
Those would take another 25 years to be recognised by the Mail on Sunday and by everybody else.
Everybody else that is occupying a place or similar in the mass propaganda, media business.
But the Mail on Sunday has already messed up any remnants of a moral message arising from the Prescott adulterous irresponsibility.
Prescott, like the conniving corrupting Charles Clarke, Prescott’s cabinet colleague and fellow travelling time-server in public office, has always been a bogus member of ‘the movement’.
He is petty, small-minded and has always lacked the basic depth that he must have had if he warranted being taken seriously as a true and trusted champion of the people whose lives literally depended on the deeds and or more likely the misdeeds of people like Prescott occupying positions of public authority and ‘power’ in the country.
I had asked him to explain one of the hundreds of contradictions in the then Labour regime in the UK.
It was about fiddling the official statistics and I asked him to explain why the official statistics on joblessness were being fiddled>
I assumed that he would direct his officials to address the details, as I knew that he lacked the necessary abilities to do that himself but I did know that even he knew the meaning and the implications for ‘democracy’ of the unacceptability, even in the context of the 1970s Britain, of fiddling the figures.
Prescott’s reply was staggeringly stupid.
And it missed the point
As always Prescott misses the main picture
That is why, more than 20 years since my previous attempt at getting him to tell the straight facts about Government behaviour I came across the fact that he was back in office and that his office had been given the shorthand name of ODPM. I immediately described his Department’s acronym ODPM as the ODiously Parasitical Moron’s Department [and permutations to similar effects]
The shocking truth about the UK political system [!!!] is NOT that there is no moral authority from the people in the country for the likes of Prescott to be in public office.
Th shocking truth is that the likes of Prescott are ALLOWED to get into public office.
And that they are even revered! Whilst holding those offices
The ‘revelations’ only leak out by default
The political system in Britain is a thoroughly corrupt immoral system
It is an opportunistic, insensitive,, uncaring, unethical system that will only be replaced by anything remotely resembling an ethical, moral one when the inevitable critical convergence occurs between all the crooked couriers of careeristic missions and manifestos
Even in the Mail on Sunday today [Sunday 30 April 2006]
there are paragraphs and paragraphs of plugs for the ‘wonderful boss’ that John Prescott alleged was.
And this is being attributed to Mac Clifford’s latest prize cash-machine –Tracey Temple, whom Clifford has been trailing for the past 48 hours to the media in advance of the splash in the Mail on Sunday.
That build up was typically corrupt and untruthful.
In the over-hyped Yet the fact that the are is a living devastating condemnation of the assumed democratic system.
How dare someone like Prescott – and the dozens of others who have been exposed as being dishonest, corrupt and immoral in office, although not exhaustively - is the although to those who are not ‘card-carrying’ members of the UK Labour Party, the likes of Charles Clarke, Tony Blair and John Prescott do what they do with the consent of the members of the Labour Party.
They don’t.
It is a myth to say that there is any democratic mechanism in the Party which I have re-named the Blaired party,
The Labour Party of the past which had certain organisational structures for some debate and for at least partially holding party officials and representatives to account has been killed off by the combined corruption epitomised and personified by Tony Blair and Neil Kinnock and the rest of their petty, small-minded time-serving pocket-enhancing small-time ‘political leaders’ that have hijacked the Party and have now consolidated their hold all over Britain.
That Labour Party will not come to life again.
Not in the foreseeable future.
If there is any revival of the Labour Party, it will take a very serious social upheaval before the Blaired sort of Party is consigned to the dustbin and modestly democratic Party is created in its place.
As things ordinarily stand today, there is no likelihood of any social upheaval occurring in the immediate future in Britain.
And therefore there is no likelihood of any fundamental change away from the Blairing away of society.
This Blairing way of Britain will of course logically run into grounds at one point.
That point is as yet not visible.
Not as I write
But things may change
Events may occur that will defy all assumptions underlying all these observations.
Which also includes and affects the roles and the relevance of other so-called mainstream Parties.
And for the same reasons and by the extension of the same logical and ethical analysis I can mark the renaming the Liberal Democratic Party as the Lib Dims. Party
I was beaten to the post on that by Andrea Perry, who has been in my view one of the rarest of British political journalists!
A witty intelligent and humorous woman with a very identifiable moral stance about the role of holders of public office
So I updated Andrea’s file as it were and renamed the Liberal Democrats the Liberal Dumbs Party
I illustrate this by a recent sample of the Lib Dumbness of Simon Hughes who made an appearance on BBC Weekend News and answered parrot-like questions being put to him by presenter Michelle Hussain [Saturday 29 April 2006] One of the first things he did say was that his party was not known for calling for people to resign!
That is so morally inept!
And so typically Liberally Dumbish!
[To be continued]
Due here at 2350 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
From the previous edition:
aadhikaronline reports and commentaries on Saturday 29 April 2006
Due here at 2350 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 April 2006
The scheduled report “What makes Louise Alexander blog?” has now been postponed indefinitely due to aadhikaronline legal decision based on the Khoodeelaar! campaign against CrossRail hole court action programme due to begin against the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems Group of councillors on Tuesday 2 May 2006
The Blair Corruption of the inner cities in Britain Project – a special report here shortly
From 1410 GMT Thursday 27 April 2006
Who are ‘the Muslims’, ‘the Bengalis’,’the Bangladeshis’,’ the Asians’,’ the Sylhettis’,’the Seelotees’ in Tower Hamlets? And how many ‘languages’ in fact are spoken in the East End of London?
Who are the ‘candidates’ that represent the people on the ground, regardless of what ethnicity, race and religion the people are?
AADHIKARonline reports start here at 1410 GMT Thursday 27 April 2006-04-27
Why does the East London Advertiser
get it wrong again in its print edition [and web site story about an election public meeting held at the Brady Centre in the Hanbury Street on Tuesday 25 April 2006 ? The ‘local paper’ says “Muslim sect attacks Bengali voters”, when the fact is that in Tower Hamlets, the word “Muslim” is almost synonymous with the word “Bangladeshi” [which is the word the paper should have used but has failed to use].
What lies behind this failure to refer accurately to any groups’ identity in context?
If there is any group that is to be referred to or identified by its home use of a language then the group is not even ‘Bangladesh’. It is Seelottee. That is the more accurate word. And the most communicative.
Why, then, does the local paper fail to recognise this reality?
After all. The Seelottee language has been spoken as a major language in the East End for the best part of the past 100 years.
It has not been Bengali.
? That is a different language.
And a very different story.
[To be continued]
From the 1st edition AADHIKARonline Thursday 27 April 2006
exclusive khoodeelaaronline investigation into Tower Hamlets Council
Khoodeelaar! language of accountability dominates the Third Brady Centre humiliation of Michael Keith over “Crossrail hole collusion”!
an AADHIKARonline investigation
. To send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikaronline@yahoo.co.uk
. To make a direct communication on a mater of policy addressing the Editor and Publisher, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikareditor@yahoo.co.uk
Who are the ‘candidates’ that represent the people on the ground, regardless of what ethnicity, race and religion the people are?
AADHIKARonline reports start here at 1410 GMT Thursday 27 April 2006-04-27
Why does the East London Advertiser
get it wrong again in its print edition [and web site story about an election public meeting held at the Brady Centre in the Hanbury Street on Tuesday 25 April 2006 ? The ‘local paper’ says “Muslim sect attacks Bengali voters”, when the fact is that in Tower Hamlets, the word “Muslim” is almost synonymous with the word “Bangladeshi” [which is the word the paper should have used but has failed to use].
What lies behind this failure to refer accurately to any groups’ identity in context?
If there is any group that is to be referred to or identified by its home use of a language then the group is not even ‘Bangladesh’. It is Seelottee. That is the more accurate word. And the most communicative.
Why, then, does the local paper fail to recognise this reality?
After all. The Seelottee language has been spoken as a major language in the East End for the best part of the past 100 years.
It has not been Bengali.
? That is a different language.
And a very different story.
[To be continued]
From the 1st edition AADHIKARonline Thursday 27 April 2006
exclusive khoodeelaaronline investigation into Tower Hamlets Council
. To send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikaronline@yahoo.co.uk
. To make a direct communication on a mater of policy addressing the Editor and Publisher, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikareditor@yahoo.co.uk
posted by editormuhammadHaque at 1:53 PM
0 comments
